Delivery Models for Decentralised Rural Electrification - Revision history

Ranisha at 13:23, 5 August 2016

2016-08-05T13:23:04Z

Ranisha at 13:22, 5 August 2016

2016-08-05T13:22:20Z

Ranisha at 13:21, 5 August 2016

2016-08-05T13:21:44Z

Dipti Vaghela: Created page with "{{HPNET Project Database |HPNET name=Delivery Models for Decentralised Rural Electrification |HPNET description=The purpose of this report is to analyse the impact of delivery..."

2016-07-30T04:16:10Z

Created page with "{{HPNET Project Database |HPNET name=Delivery Models for Decentralised Rural Electrification |HPNET description=The purpose of this report is to analyse the impact of delivery..."

New page

{{HPNET Project Database
|HPNET name=Delivery Models for Decentralised Rural Electrification
|HPNET description=The purpose of this report is to analyse the impact of delivery models on the creation of sustainable welfare benefits. Three case studies are selected, one renewable energy mini-grid project or programme from each of Nepal, Peru and Kenya. Although rural electrification poses a great challenge to all three countries (only 32 per cent of rural Nepalese, 23 per cent of rural Peruvians and 10 per cent of rural Kenyans have access to electricity in their homes), their different physical, institutional, economic and socio-cultural contexts have led to different approaches to rural electrification. These
approaches, alongside some of the countries’ major electrification challenges, are described in Chapter 2. The case studies are compared and analysed in terms of their ability to generate sustainable welfare benefits for their intended
beneficiaries (Chapter 3). A series of 43 Sustainability Indicators (based on five dimensions of Sustainability – Economic,
Technical, Social, Environmental and Institutional Sustainability) – are designed and used to assess the projects’ impact and their likely sustainability.
|HPNET author=Dr Annabel Yadoo
|HPNET project location=-12.22191773218725, -71.76270246505737
|HPNET region=Global/Multiple
|HPNET product type=Documents
|HPNET topic=Policy, People and Environment
|HPNET region global=Nepal
|HPNET product type contacts=
|HPNET product type documents=Case Studies
|HPNET product type multimedia=
|HPNET topic technology sub electro=
|HPNET topic technology sub transmission=
|HPNET topic people sub=Community Participation
}}
{{HPNET File Upload
|HPNET file type=External link
|HPNET file internal=
|HPNET file external=http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/16032IIED.pdf
}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{HPNET Project Database
 |HPNET name=Delivery Models for Decentralised Rural Electrification
-|HPNET description=The purpose of this report is to analyse the impact of delivery models on the creation of sustainable welfare benefits. Three case studies are selected, one renewable energy mini-grid project or programme from each of Nepal, Peru and Kenya. Although rural electrification poses a great challenge to all three countries (only 32 per cent of rural Nepalese, 23 per cent of rural Peruvians and 10 per cent of rural Kenyans have access to electricity in their homes), their different physical, institutional, economic and socio-cultural contexts have led to different approaches to rural electrification. These approaches, alongside some of the countries’ major electrification challenges, are described in Chapter 2. The case studies are compared and analysed in terms of their ability to generate sustainable welfare benefits for their intended
+|HPNET description=The purpose of this report is to analyse the impact of delivery models on the creation of sustainable welfare benefits. Three case studies are selected, one renewable energy mini-grid project or programme from each of Nepal, Peru and Kenya. Although rural electrification poses a great challenge to all three countries (only 32 per cent of rural Nepalese, 23 per cent of rural Peruvians and 10 per cent of rural Kenyans have access to electricity in their homes), their different physical, institutional, economic and socio-cultural contexts have led to different approaches to rural electrification. These approaches, alongside some of the countries’ major electrification challenges, are described in Chapter 2. The case studies are compared and analysed in terms of their ability to generate sustainable welfare benefits for their intended beneficiaries (Chapter 3). A series of 43 Sustainability Indicators (based on five dimensions of Sustainability – Economic, Technical, Social, Environmental and Institutional Sustainability) – are designed and used to assess the projects’ impact and their likely sustainability.
 beneficiaries (Chapter 3). A series of 43 Sustainability Indicators (based on five dimensions of Sustainability – Economic,
 Technical, Social, Environmental and Institutional Sustainability) – are designed and used to assess the projects’ impact and their likely sustainability.
 |HPNET year=2012
 |HPNET author=Dr Annabel Yadoo