Tourism Surcharge to Promote Rural Electrification in Mexico - Revision history

Ranisha: /* Effects on Rural Electrification */

2014-08-15T14:25:42Z

‎Effects on Rural Electrification

Ranisha at 14:25, 15 August 2014

2014-08-15T14:25:15Z

Ranisha at 13:16, 13 August 2014

2014-08-13T13:16:49Z

Wiki Gardener: Wiki Gardener moved page Tourism Surcharge to Promote Rural Electrification to Tourism Surcharge to Promote Rural Electrification in Mexico

2014-08-12T11:55:09Z

Wiki Gardener moved page Tourism Surcharge to Promote Rural Electrification to Tourism Surcharge to Promote Rural Electrification in Mexico

Can't load revision 82645

at 11:53, 12 August 2014

2014-08-12T11:53:59Z

Can't load revision 82644

at 11:46, 12 August 2014

2014-08-12T11:46:22Z

Can't load revision 82640

at 11:45, 12 August 2014

2014-08-12T11:45:23Z

Can't load revision 82639

at 10:18, 11 July 2014

2014-07-11T10:18:13Z

Can't load revision 80899

at 15:26, 8 July 2013

2013-07-08T15:26:39Z

Can't load revision 60123

at 15:25, 8 July 2013

2013-07-08T15:25:24Z

Can't load revision 60122

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 = Effects on [[Rural Electrification|Rural Electrification]] =
-The original costs for a '''[[Solar Home Systems|Solar Home System (SHS)]]''' are around US$ 800. Such a system can power, for instance, three energy-saving lamps, a radio, and a television (< 20 watts of consumption).
+The original costs for a '''[[Solar Home Systems (SHS)|Solar Home System (SHS)]]''' are around US$ 800. Such a system can power, for instance, three energy-saving lamps, a radio, and a television (< 20 watts of consumption).
 With a budget of around US$ 80 million annually and a subsidy quota of 70% of the original costs, some 150,000 households or 750,000 people could be provided with solar power systems annually. In other words, the tourism levy could provide power to all off-grid households (some 1 million, or 5 million people) within around 7 years. In most cases, SHS would be used, but in exceptional cases other regenerative sources of energy or hybrid systems would be used.
@@ Line 79: / Line 79: @@
 [[Tourism_Surcharge_to_Promote_Rural_Electrification_in_Mexico#Overview|►Go to Top]]
 = Pros and Cons of a Tourism Surcharge =

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 = Overview =
@@ Line 60: / Line 59: @@
 <u>The following structure is proposed for the use of the tourist levy:</u>
-*The biggest part should be used to improve the access of sustainable energy in rural and low-income areas. It could be used to subsidize the [[Solar Home Systems|Solar Home Systems (SHS)]] which will be installed in off-grid areas.
+*The biggest part should be used to improve the access of sustainable energy in rural and low-income areas. It could be used to subsidize the [[Solar Home Systems (SHS)|Solar Home Systems (SHS)]] which will be installed in off-grid areas.
 *About a quarter of the incoming money should be used to finance programmes to "green" the tourism-sector (efficient energy and electricity use, solar energy for heating water, water-saving technologies, waste management)
 *Another part could be used to finance demonstrations of renewable and efficient energy supply at the most visited points of the country.
@@ Line 123: / Line 122: @@
 <references />
 [[Category:Rural_Electrification]]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *In addition, the tourist sector will probably grow faster than any other industry in Mexico in the next few years. The Word Travel & Tourism Council forecasts a 7.7annual growth rate (in terms of constant prices) up to 2012.
-<br/>
+[[Tourism_Surcharge_to_Promote_Rural_Electrification_in_Mexico#Overview|►Go to Top]]<br/>
 = Specifics and Adaptation of the Proposal to Mexico =
@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 Other countries already use a levy on tourism or tourist tax to a considerable extent. For instance, Cuba charges an entry and exit fee of $20 each way. The entry fee for the Seychelles is $90 per person.
-<br/>
+[[Tourism_Surcharge_to_Promote_Rural_Electrification_in_Mexico#Overview|►Go to Top]]
 = Inflow of Funds and Proposed Use of Funds =
@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 The average surcharge each tourist has to pay only amounts to US$ 8. In terms of the overall costs of the trip, this fee will probably not even amount to 1% in almost all cases.
+<br/>
 <u>The following structure is proposed for the use of the tourist levy:</u>
-*The biggest part should be used to improve the access of sustainable energy in rural and low-income areas. It could be used to subsidize the [[Solar_Home_Systems|Solar Home Systems (SHS)]] which will be installed in off-grid areas.
+*The biggest part should be used to improve the access of sustainable energy in rural and low-income areas. It could be used to subsidize the [[Solar Home Systems|Solar Home Systems (SHS)]] which will be installed in off-grid areas.
 *About a quarter of the incoming money should be used to finance programmes to "green" the tourism-sector (efficient energy and electricity use, solar energy for heating water, water-saving technologies, waste management)
 *Another part could be used to finance demonstrations of renewable and efficient energy supply at the most visited points of the country.
@@ Line 66: / Line 66: @@
 [[File:Figure1mexico.gif|frame|center|421px|Use of the inflow of funds from the surcharge|alt=Figure 1: Use of the inflow of funds from the surcharge]]
 = Effects on [[Rural Electrification|Rural Electrification]] =
-The original costs for a '''[[Solar_Home_Systems|Solar Home System (SHS)]]''' are around US$ 800. Such a system can power, for instance, three energy-saving lamps, a radio, and a television (< 20 watts of consumption).
+The original costs for a '''[[Solar Home Systems|Solar Home System (SHS)]]''' are around US$ 800. Such a system can power, for instance, three energy-saving lamps, a radio, and a television (< 20 watts of consumption).
 With a budget of around US$ 80 million annually and a subsidy quota of 70% of the original costs, some 150,000 households or 750,000 people could be provided with solar power systems annually. In other words, the tourism levy could provide power to all off-grid households (some 1 million, or 5 million people) within around 7 years. In most cases, SHS would be used, but in exceptional cases other regenerative sources of energy or hybrid systems would be used.
@@ Line 75: / Line 79: @@
 In addition, tourism could be made more environmentally friendly and attractive
-<br/>
+[[Tourism_Surcharge_to_Promote_Rural_Electrification_in_Mexico#Overview|►Go to Top]]
 = Pros and Cons of a Tourism Surcharge =
@@ Line 92: / Line 96: @@
 #The average burden on individual tourists is slight and will hardly be noticeable in many cases.
-<br/>
+[[Tourism_Surcharge_to_Promote_Rural_Electrification_in_Mexico#Overview|►Go to Top]]
 = Findings and Assessment =
@@ Line 105: / Line 109: @@
 However, Mexico is a developing nation that cannot expect to get (much) financing for electrification from outside the country, as there are much poorer countries in the world. In other words, the financing will have to come from within the country. A levy on tourism is certainly one of the most interesting means of financing.
-<br/>
+[[Tourism_Surcharge_to_Promote_Rural_Electrification_in_Mexico#Overview|►Go to Top]]
 = Further Information =
-*[[Portal:Financing_and_Funding|Financing and Funding Portal on energypedia]]<br/>
+*[[Portal:Financing and Funding|Financing and Funding Portal on energypedia]]<br/>
 *[[Portal:Grid|Grid Portal on energypedia]]
-*[[Mexico_Energy_Situation|Mexico Energy Situation]]
+*[[Mexico Energy Situation|Mexico Energy Situation]]
-−
 = References =
@@ Line 119: / Line 123: @@
 <references />
 [[Category:Rural_Electrification]]