|
|
Line 110: |
Line 110: |
| | | |
| <br/> | | <br/> |
| + | |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 117: |
Line 118: |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 614px;" colspan="3" | '''Africa''' | | | style="width: 614px;" colspan="3" | '''Africa''' |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Country | | | style="width: 102px;" | Country |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | Plan title | | | style="width: 359px;" | Plan title |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | Status as of 11/2014 | | | style="width: 153px;" | Status as of 11/2014 |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Cameroon | | | style="width: 102px;" | Cameroon |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Plan Directeur d’Electrification Rurale (PDER)'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Plan Directeur d’Electrification Rurale (PDER)'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Project-and-Operations/- Cameroon - AR Electricity Project -[1].pdf Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Project-and-Operations/- Cameroon - AR Electricity Project -[1].pdf Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Ethiopia | | | style="width: 102px;" | Ethiopia |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Off-grid rural electrification master plan'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Off-grid rural electrification master plan'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.reegle.info/policy-and-regulatory-overviews/ET Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.reegle.info/policy-and-regulatory-overviews/ET Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Guinea | | | style="width: 102px;" | Guinea |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | | | | style="width: 359px;" | |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.gopa-intec.de/Guinea-Studies-for-the-national-electr.1362.0.html Data collection study conducted] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.gopa-intec.de/Guinea-Studies-for-the-national-electr.1362.0.html Data collection study conducted] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Kenya | | | style="width: 102px;" | Kenya |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Rural Electrification Master Plan'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Rural Electrification Master Plan'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.paceaa.org/workshops/Kenya Training Workshop/05. OVERVIEW OF THE RURAL ELECTRIFICATION STRATEGY IN THE COUNTRY AND PLANNING METHODOLOGY FOR RURAL ELECTRIFICATION ADOPTED.pdf Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.paceaa.org/workshops/Kenya Training Workshop/05. OVERVIEW OF THE RURAL ELECTRIFICATION STRATEGY IN THE COUNTRY AND PLANNING METHODOLOGY FOR RURAL ELECTRIFICATION ADOPTED.pdf Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Liberia | | | style="width: 102px;" | Liberia |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''National Electrification Master Plan'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''National Electrification Master Plan'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://modi.mech.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/LiberiaEnergySectorReform_Phase4Report-Final_2013-08.pdf Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://modi.mech.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/LiberiaEnergySectorReform_Phase4Report-Final_2013-08.pdf Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Mali | | | style="width: 102px;" | Mali |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Plan Directeur d’Electrification Rurale du Mali - PDER'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Plan Directeur d’Electrification Rurale du Mali - PDER'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.giz.de/fachexpertise/downloads/2013-en-pep-informationsveranstaltung-pv-ghana-zebner.pdf Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.giz.de/fachexpertise/downloads/2013-en-pep-informationsveranstaltung-pv-ghana-zebner.pdf Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Mozambique | | | style="width: 102px;" | Mozambique |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Low Cost Rural Electrification Master Plan'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Low Cost Rural Electrification Master Plan'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.powersystemdynamics.com/studies_and_designs/mozambique.html Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.powersystemdynamics.com/studies_and_designs/mozambique.html Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Uganda | | | style="width: 102px;" | Uganda |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Rural Electrification Strategy and Plan'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Rural Electrification Strategy and Plan'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.rea.or.ug/phocadownload/rural electrification strategy and plan 2013-2022.pdf Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.rea.or.ug/phocadownload/rural electrification strategy and plan 2013-2022.pdf Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Rwanda | | | style="width: 102px;" | Rwanda |
− | | + | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Electricity''''Access Programme Planning''''' |
− | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Electricity''''Access Programme Planning'' | + | |
− | | + | |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/sites/ppp.worldbank.org/files/documents/Prospectus0for1cty0Access0Programme.pdf Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/sites/ppp.worldbank.org/files/documents/Prospectus0for1cty0Access0Programme.pdf Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Senegal | | | style="width: 102px;" | Senegal |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Plan d’Action Sénégalaise d’Électrification Rurale, PASER'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Plan d’Action Sénégalaise d’Électrification Rurale, PASER'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/icept/Public/Senegal - ICEPT working paper.pdf Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/icept/Public/Senegal - ICEPT working paper.pdf Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Tanzania | | | style="width: 102px;" | Tanzania |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Integrated Rural Electrification Planning (IREP)'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Integrated Rural Electrification Planning (IREP)'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.irep.rea.go.tz/AboutIREP/Context.aspx Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.irep.rea.go.tz/AboutIREP/Context.aspx Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Zambia | | | style="width: 102px;" | Zambia |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Rural Electrification Master Plan, REMP'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Rural Electrification Master Plan, REMP'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [https://pmrcblog.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/the-state-of-the-energy-sector-in-zambia.pdf Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [https://pmrcblog.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/the-state-of-the-energy-sector-in-zambia.pdf Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 614px;" colspan="3" | '''Asia''' | | | style="width: 614px;" colspan="3" | '''Asia''' |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Country | | | style="width: 102px;" | Country |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | Plan title | | | style="width: 359px;" | Plan title |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | Status as of 11/2014 | | | style="width: 153px;" | Status as of 11/2014 |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Cambodia | | | style="width: 102px;" | Cambodia |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Sustainable Rural Electrification Master Plan, SREP'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Sustainable Rural Electrification Master Plan, SREP'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [https://energypedia.info/wiki/Cambodia_Energy_Situation Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [https://energypedia.info/wiki/Cambodia_Energy_Situation Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Indonesia | | | style="width: 102px;" | Indonesia |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Least Cost Electrification Plan'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Least Cost Electrification Plan'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2014/01/30/000461832_20140130154855/Rendered/PDF/843140BRI0Indo0ox0382136B00PUBLIC00.pdf Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2014/01/30/000461832_20140130154855/Rendered/PDF/843140BRI0Indo0ox0382136B00PUBLIC00.pdf Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Laos | | | style="width: 102px;" | Laos |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Rural Electrification Master Plan'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Rural Electrification Master Plan'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1272A Survey of International Activities in Energy Access and Electrification.pdf Plan under development] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1272A Survey of International Activities in Energy Access and Electrification.pdf Plan under development] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Myanmar | | | style="width: 102px;" | Myanmar |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''National Electrification Plan'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''National Electrification Plan'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [https://energypedia.info/wiki/Achieving_Universal_Access_to_Electricity_in_Myanmar#National_Electrification_Plan_Implementation Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [https://energypedia.info/wiki/Achieving_Universal_Access_to_Electricity_in_Myanmar#National_Electrification_Plan_Implementation Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Papua New Guinea | | | style="width: 102px;" | Papua New Guinea |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''National Electrification Rollout Plan (NEROP)'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''National Electrification Rollout Plan (NEROP)'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [https://www.devex.com/projects/tenders/energy-sector-development-project-in-papua-new-guinea-preparation-of-national-electrification-least-cost-geospatial-rollout-plan/150770 Plan under development] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [https://www.devex.com/projects/tenders/energy-sector-development-project-in-papua-new-guinea-preparation-of-national-electrification-least-cost-geospatial-rollout-plan/150770 Plan under development] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Philippines | | | style="width: 102px;" | Philippines |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Missionary Electrification Development Plan (MEDP)'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Missionary Electrification Development Plan (MEDP)'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [https://www.doe.gov.ph/power-and-electrification/development-plans/318-missionary-electrification-development-plan Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [https://www.doe.gov.ph/power-and-electrification/development-plans/318-missionary-electrification-development-plan Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 614px;" colspan="3" | '''Latin America''' | | | style="width: 614px;" colspan="3" | '''Latin America''' |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Country | | | style="width: 102px;" | Country |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | Plan title | | | style="width: 359px;" | Plan title |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | Status as of 11/2014 | | | style="width: 153px;" | Status as of 11/2014 |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Bolivia | | | style="width: 102px;" | Bolivia |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | ''Plan Bolivia de Electrificación Rural (PLABER)'' | | | style="width: 359px;" | ''Plan Bolivia de Electrificación Rural (PLABER)'' |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 153px;" | [https://energypedia.info/wiki/Bolivia_Energy_Situation#Off-grid_and_self-supplying_systems Completed] | | | style="width: 153px;" | [https://energypedia.info/wiki/Bolivia_Energy_Situation#Off-grid_and_self-supplying_systems Completed] |
− |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 102px;" | Peru | | | style="width: 102px;" | Peru |
− |
| |
| | style="width: 359px;" | | | | style="width: 359px;" | |
| + | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CEUQFjAE&url=http://dger.minem.gob.pe/archivos/PlanMaestro_ER_PeruSummary.pdf&ei=I5J0VIfsM8_aaqKYgsgC&usg=AFQjCNE3HdQx-rmh6P8fJPMRpJhi2JEQRg&bvm=bv.80185997,d.d2s Data collection study conducted] |
| + | |} |
| + | <br/> |
| | | |
− | | style="width: 153px;" | [http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CEUQFjAE&url=http://dger.minem.gob.pe/archivos/PlanMaestro_ER_PeruSummary.pdf&ei=I5J0VIfsM8_aaqKYgsgC&usg=AFQjCNE3HdQx-rmh6P8fJPMRpJhi2JEQRg&bvm=bv.80185997,d.d2s Data collection study conducted]<br/>
| + | => [[Service_Pack_Mini-grids|Back to Service Pack Overview]]<br/> |
| | | |
− | |}
| + | <br/> |
Electrification plans in general, or rural electrification plans more specifically, are a means to optimizing electricity services in a given territory, within a given period of time in accordance with pre-defined strategic objectives (Club ER, 2010). Although in theory they are situated between the strategic and program levels, a clear distinction between these layers is often not visible in practice (see e.g. Uganda).
Electrification plans commonly depict intended developments in the field of electrification based on a spatial analysis of domestic demand, socio-economic activities and load forecasts, discerning between available electrification options (grid extension, mini-grids or off-grid systems) (IED, 2013).
In addition to providing an indication as to the required overall levels of investment for electrification within a given area, electrification plans are an important source of guidance in the preparation and planning of project level activities. The provision of principle demand predictions, spatial division and prioritization concepts on the basis of transparent and objective criteria provide important indications for project design, in particular regarding the choice of the most suitable electrification option in a given context, identification of potential project sites and indications for adequate tariff setting.
The existence of a formalized electrification plan furthermore contributes towards planning dependability. For mini-grid projects, this applies in particular to the mitigation of risks associated with future grid extension.
The aforementioned benefits only fully materialize where electrification planning provides sufficient detail on key aspects such as grid extension plans or a sufficient consideration of decentralized solutions. In many African countries, however, this is currently not the case (GVEP, 2011).
The principle duty of electricity related strategy and policy development naturally resides within the hands of the sovereign state, but a whole range of actors are potentially involved in the process. The following will therefore present an overview on various actors and their potential involvement in electrification planning (based on Club ER).
The state, through its respective subordinated structures, is the principal agent for electrification planning. It bears general responsibility for strategic, planning and program-level decisions on electricity and, in particular through its decision making regarding the subsidization of rural electrification, acts as a general facilitator. Apart from governmental decision making and ministries in charge of energy, a range of other public sector institutions are commonly involved in electrification planning:
Where liberalized markets prevail, electricity companies commonly affect electrification planning through negotiation of their roles with state actors, e.g. in terms of agreements on the limits of their infrastructure development activities, or the conditions surrounding the purchase or sale of electricity from/to the grid.
With regards to the processes underlying electrification planning, a range of possible approaches, requiring different levels of data input, exist. Generally speaking, however, the process adheres to the following four principle steps:
The choice of a basic approach to electricity planning precedes the actual planning process and poses a key determinant for subsequent steps. Approaches can be distinguished in accordance with intended process outcomes (Club ER):
For reasons of data availability and methodological differences, the type and amount of primary data collected in preparation of an electrification planning exercise varies between cases. Ideally, however, electrification planning is based on the collection and geographical referencing of data in all of the following areas (IED, 2013):
The process of modelling electricity demand is strongly related to the type and quality of available primary data. In principle, two basic approaches exist for demand modelling: Top-down or bottom-up.
In the top-down approach, demand is forecast through the application of econometric methods, such as the application of linear regression statistical techniques to model electricity demand on the basis of estimated changes in the number of households and GDP development.
Bottom-up models on the other hand create demand profiles on the basis of socio-economic surveys, utilizing a higher degree of data input to achieve a higher level of precision in the modelling process. A well-known example for bottom-up design was developed by IED and is used within their GEOSIM-tool (software based solutions): The methodology uses extensive data for the mapping of education, health and economic services to model demand, identify and prioritize so called development poles.
The fourth and final step of the planning process comprises of the assessment of electrification solutions (network expansion, mini-grid, standalone system) and the optimization of the corresponding installation setups in accordance with the criteria defined previously (see planning approach). It is also possible to incorporate additional considerations, e.g. regarding land-use management, at this point.
Some of the main factors to be taken into account during this step include geographic parameters such as the availability of energy resources, distance to grid and between localities, or the dispersal of housing in a given area, topologic expediency and the prevalence of natural constraints (forests, protected areas, etc.) (Club ER).