|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | + | [[Portal:Solar|►Back to Solar Portal]] |
| | + | = Overview = |
| | | | |
| | + | Pico PV Systems have emerged as a strong contender in the solar market of developing countries. Thus,[[Energising_Development_(EnDev)|EnDev]] has developed a test series to test their effectiveness.<br/> |
| | | | |
| − | = Overview =
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Pico PV Systems has emerged as a strong contender in the solar market of Developing countries . Thus,[[Energising_Development_(EnDev)|EnDev]] has developed a test series to test its effectiveness.
| |
| − | <br/>
| |
| | == Technical Test I<br/> == | | == Technical Test I<br/> == |
| | | | |
| Line 98: |
Line 97: |
| | <u><span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">The publication is available in English and German:</span></span></u> | | <u><span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'">The publication is available in English and German:</span></span></u> |
| | | | |
| − | *[[:File:Gtz_solar_lanterns_test.pdf|English version]] | + | *[[:File:Solar Lanterns Test - Shades of Light.pdf|English version]] |
| − | *[[:File:Gtz_solarleuchtentest.pdf|German version]]<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'"></span></span> | + | *[[:File:Solarleuchtentest - Licht und Schatten.pdf|German version]]<span class="MsoPageNumber"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'arial','sans-serif'"></span></span> |
| | | | |
| | <br/> | | <br/> |
Latest revision as of 09:38, 1 August 2018
►Back to Solar Portal
[edit] Overview
Pico PV Systems have emerged as a strong contender in the solar market of developing countries. Thus,EnDev has developed a test series to test their effectiveness.
[edit] Technical Test I
The technical tests are performed by Fraunhofer Gesellschaft (FhG/ISE) in Freiburg, Germany. In the first test phase (2007/ 10 - 2008/ 01) twelve systems were tested on road capability with special focus on mechanical stability, lighting characteristics and operability.
These systems were in detail:
- GL9000SW, Global Marketing Technologies Inc. (US) --> overall picture bad
- MS01, Macro-Solar Technology Co,. Ltd (China) --> overall picture very bad
- Solar 2007-1, Solarprojekt-Freilassing e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture good
- Mightylight, Cosmos Ignite Innovations (India) --> overall picture good
- AISHWARYA, Noble energy Solar Technologies Ltd. (?) --> overall picture middle
- Solar Home System, "Afghanistan" --> overall picture very bad
- 2212SL Wuara, SolEnergy Africa (PTY) Ltd (South Africa) --> overall picture very bad
- SOLUX-LED-100, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle
- Sun x-set mobile, Würth Solergy (Germany) --> overall picture middle - bad
- Glowstar GS7, Sollatek Ltd. (UK) --> overall picture middle
- AS018, Astral Solar technology Co. (China) --> overall picture bad
- SOLUX-LED-50, SOLUX e.v. (Germany) --> overall picture middle
[edit] Technical Test II
Seven solar lanterns reached the second testing stage, of which four are German-made: the Solux LED 100 and Solux LED 50 of the Solux e.V. development assistance project, the Solar 2007-1 by the Freilassing solar promotion project, and the sun x-set mobile produced by Würth. Other lamps of the main test were the Glowstar GS7 of the British company Sollatek, the Aishwarya NEST-6543 of the Indian manufacturer Noble Energy and the Mightylight 3040, also Indian made.
In the following table you find a selection of the most important criteria:
Testcriteria Level 2
|
Solar module
|
Does the system deliver the nominal rated values of power output, open- circuit voltage and shortcircuit current?
|
Battery
|
Measure of capacity (NiMH+ Pb), persistence against overcharging (NiMH), simple durability test (NiMH)
|
|
Luminous fux
|
average of 210 minutes
|
|
Brennzeit/autonome Zeit
|
The duration is measured until luminous flux falls to 70 % of the initial value. (beginning from a fully-charged battery)
|
Luminous efficacy
|
average is obtained from a period of 210 minutes, beginning from a fully-charged battery.
|
Charge Controller
|
Spannungslevel Ladeschluss-/ Lastabwurfspannung, Eigenverbrauch, Signalisierungen, Schutz vor Entladung durch Modul, Wirkungsgrad
|
Ballast device
|
How good is the efficiency of the ballast?
|
|
Cycle test / degradation of CFL-lamps
|
How long do CFL lamps last when subjected to a switching cycle of ‘on’ for 60 seconds, ‘off’ for 150 seconds?
|
|
Simulation
|
Ermittlung der solaren Deckungsrate für 5 Standorte bei einer Brenndauer von täglich 3,5 Stunden
|
[edit] Field Test
The publication is available in English and German:
[edit] Further Information
