Revision as of 15:57, 24 March 2011

This guide to planning is intended to serve agricultural extension officers as a comprehensive tool for arriving at decisions concerning the suitability of locations for family-sized biogas plants. The detailed planning outline has a data column for entering the gathered information and a rating column for noting the results of evaluation.

Evaluation criteria are:

+ Siting condition are favorable
o Siting condition are unfavorable, but: a) compensable by project activities; b) not serious enough to cause ultimate failure
- Siting condition are not satisfactory

Despite its detailed nature, this planning guide is only a framework within which the extension officer should proceed to conduct a careful investigation and give due consideration, however subjectively, to the individual conditions in order to arrive at a locally practical solution. By no means is this planning guide intended to relieve the agricultural extension officer of the responsibility to thoroughly familiarize himself with the on-the-spot situation and to judge the overall value of a given location on the basis of the knowledge thus gained.

Detailed planning guide for biogas plants

Initial situation

Data

Rating

Addresses/project characterization

Plant acronym:
Address of operator/customer:
Place/region/country:
Indigenous proj. org./executing org.:
Extension officer/advisor:

General user data

Household structure and number of persons:
User's economic situation:
Crops: types, areas, manner of cultivation:
Non-agricultural activity:
Household/farm income:
Cultural and social characteristics of user:

Problems leading to the "biogas approach"

Energy-supply bottlenecks:
Workload for prior source of energy:
Poor soil structure/yields:
Erosion/deforestation:
Poor hygiene and other factors:

Objectives of the measure "biogas plant"

User interests:
Project interests:
Other interests:

Natural / Agricultural conditions

	Data	Rating
Natural conditions Mean annual temperature: Seasonal fluctuations: Diurnal variation: Rating:		- o +
Subsoil Type of soil: Groundwater table, potable water catchment area: Rating:		- o +
Water conditions Climatic zone: Annual precipitation: Dry season (months): Distance to source of water: Rating:		- o +
Livestock inventory (useful for biogas production) Animals: kind and quantity: Type of stable: Use of dung: Persons responsible for animals: Rating:		- o +
Vegetable waste (useful for biogas production) Types and quantities: Prior use: Rating:		- o +
Fertilization Customary types and quantities of fertilizer/areas fertilized: Organic fertilizer familiar/in use: Rating:		- o +
Potential sites for biogas plant Combined stable/biogas plant possible: Distance between biogas plant and livestock stable: Distance between biogas plant and place of gas consumption: Rating:		- o +
Overall rating 1		- o +

Balancing the energy demand with the biogas production

Data

Rating

Prior energy supply

Uses, source of energy, consumption:

Anticipated biogas demand (kwh/day or l/d): for cooking:; for lighting:; for cooling:; for engines:
Total gas demand: a) percentage that must be provided by the biogas plant:; b) desired demand coverage:

Available biomass (kg/d) and potential gas production (l/d)

from animal husbandry: pigs:; poultry:; cattle:
Night soil
Vegetable waste (quantities and potential gas yield): 1.; 2.
Totals: biomass and potential gas production; a) easy to procure:; b) less easy to procure:

Balancing

Gas production clearly greater than gas demand
-> positive rating (+)

Gas demand larger than gas production
-> negative rating (-); but review of results in order regarding:

a) possible reduction of gas demand by the following measures
->

b) possible increase in biogas production by the following measures
->

If the measures take hold:
-> qualified positive rating for the plant location (o)

If the measures do not take hold:
-> site rating remains negative (-)

Overall rating 2

- o +

Plant Design and Construction

Data

Rating

Selection of plant design

Locally customary type of plant:
Arguments in favor of floating-drum plant:
Arguments in favor of fixe-dome plant:
Arguments in favor of other plant(s):

Type of plant chosen:

Selection of site

Availability of building materials

Bricks/blocks/stone:
Cement:
Metal:
Sand:
Piping/fittings:
Miscellaneous:

Availability of gas appliances

Cookers:
Lamps:
...
...

Overall rating 3

- o +

Plant operation / maintenance / repair

	Data	Rating
Assessment of plant operation Incidental work: Work expenditure in h: Persons responsible: Rating with regard to anticipated implementation:		- o +
Plant maintenance Maintenance-intensive components: Maintenance work by user: Maintenance work by external assistance: Rating with regard too anticipated implementation:		- o +
Plant repair Components liable to need repair: Repairs that can be made by the user: Repairs requiring external assistance: Requisite materials and spare parts: Rating with regard to expected repair services:		- o +
Overall rating 4		- o +

Economic analysis

	Data	Rating
Time-expenditure accounting Time saved with biogas plant Time lost due to biogas plant Rating:		- o +
Microeconomic analysis Initial investment: Cost of operation/maintenance/repair: Return on investment: energy, fertilizer, otherwise: Payback time (static): Productiveness (static): Rating:		- o +
Quality factors, useful socioeconomic effects and costs Useful effects: hygiene, autonomous energy, better lighting, better working conditions, prestige: Drawbacks: need to handle night soil, negative social impact: Rating:		- o +
Overall rating 5		- o +

Social acceptance and potential for dissemination

	Data	Rating
Anticipated acceptance Participation in planning and construction Integration into agricultural setting: Integration into household: Sociocultural acceptance: Rating:		- o +
Establishing a dissemination strategy Conditions for and chances of the professional-craftsman approach: Conditions for and chances of the self-help oriented approach:		- o + - o +
General conditions for dissemination Project-executing organization and its staffing: orgnaizational structure: interest and prior experience in biogas technology: Regional infrastructure for transportation: communication: material procurement: Craftsman involvement, i.e. which acitivities: minimum qualifications: tools and machines: Training for engineers, craftsman and users: Proprietary capital, subsidy/credit requirement on the part of user: craftsmen: Rating:		- o +
Overall rating 6		- o +

Summarization

Siting conditions

	No.	Rating
Natural/agricultural conditions	1.	- o +
Balancing the energy demand and the biogas production	2.	- o +
Plant design and construction	3.	- o +
Plant operation/maintenance/repair	4.	- o +
Economic analysis	5.	- o +
Social acceptance and potential for dissemination	6.	- o +

Overall rating of siting conditions

- o +

Back to "Biogas Portal"

.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 Despite its detailed nature, this planning guide is only a framework within which the extension officer should proceed to conduct a careful investigation and give due consideration, however subjectively, to the individual conditions in order to arrive at a locally practical solution. By no means is this planning guide intended to relieve the agricultural extension officer of the responsibility to thoroughly familiarize himself with the on-the-spot situation and to judge the overall value of a given location on the basis of the knowledge thus gained.
-== Detailed planning guide for biogas plants  ==
+= Detailed planning guide for biogas plants  =
 <br>
-=== Initial situation  ===
+== Initial situation  ==
 {| width="100%" cellpadding="10" border="1"
@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 <br>
-=== Natural / Agricultural conditions  ===
+== Natural / Agricultural conditions  ==
 {| width="100%" cellpadding="10" border="1"
@@ Line 116: / Line 116: @@
 <br>
-=== Balancing the energy demand with the biogas production  ===
+== Balancing the energy demand with the biogas production  ==
 {| width="100%" cellpadding="10" border="1"
@@ Line 176: / Line 176: @@
 <br>
-=== Plant Design and Construction  ===
+== Plant Design and Construction  ==
 {| width="100%" cellpadding="10" border="1"
@@ Line 209: / Line 209: @@
 <br>
-=== Plant operation / maintenance / repair  ===
+== Plant operation / maintenance / repair  ==
 {| width="100%" cellpadding="10" border="1"
@@ Line 248: / Line 248: @@
 <br>
-=== Economic analysis  ===
+== Economic analysis  ==
 {| width="100%" cellpadding="10" border="1"
@@ Line 287: / Line 287: @@
 <br>
-=== Social acceptance and potential for dissemination  ===
+== Social acceptance and potential for dissemination  ==
 {| width="100%" cellpadding="10" border="1"
@@ Line 332: / Line 332: @@
 <br>
-=== Summarization  ===
+== Summarization  ==
 ==== Siting conditions  ====
@@ Line 374: / Line 374: @@
 |}
+<br>
 [[Biogas|Back to "Biogas Portal"]]

Community

About

Help

Contact

Search

Main Page

About energypedia

Technologies

Energy Use

Cross Cutting Issues

energypedia consult

Search

Toolbox

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Planning Guide for Biogas Plants

Revision as of 15:57, 24 March 2011

Contents

Detailed planning guide for biogas plants

Initial situation

Natural / Agricultural conditions

Balancing the energy demand with the biogas production

Plant Design and Construction

Plant operation / maintenance / repair

Economic analysis

Social acceptance and potential for dissemination

Summarization

Siting conditions

Overall rating of siting conditions

Log in / create account

Community

About

Help

Contact

Search

Main Page

About energypedia

Technologies

Energy Use

Cross Cutting Issues

energypedia consult

Search

Toolbox

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Planning Guide for Biogas Plants

Revision as of 15:57, 24 March 2011

Contents

Detailed planning guide for biogas plants

Initial situation

Natural / Agricultural conditions

Balancing the energy demand with the biogas production

Plant Design and Construction

Plant operation / maintenance / repair

Economic analysis

Social acceptance and potential for dissemination

Summarization

Siting conditions

Overall rating of siting conditions