|
|
Line 41: |
Line 41: |
| |- | | |- |
| ! scope="row" | Jordan | | ! scope="row" | Jordan |
− | | <br/> | + | | |
| + | *Solar power is currently powering the majority of camp facilities and many households |
| + | *The use of grid electricity remains high and expensive in Amman, where humanitarian agencies' head offices run |
| + | *In order to save costs, buildings' energy efficiency must be improved |
| + | |
| |- | | |- |
| ! scope="row" | Burkina Faso | | ! scope="row" | Burkina Faso |
− | | <br/> | + | | |
| + | *NGO offices are desparetly short on power in Goudoubo's camp, as there exist no computers or air-conditioning |
| + | *Investing in renewable energy technologies would solve such issues as well as street lighting and water pumping |
| + | *Investing in renewable energy technologies could also drive increased rural energy access among host populations acrocess this area of Sahel |
| + | |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
| <br/> | | <br/> |
| + | |
| + | *Fleet sharing and fuel-managemnt pratices would make sense in the 3 countries as that would: |
| + | |
| + | #Increase transport-fuel savings |
| + | #Improve air quality |
| + | |
| + | *Another negative outcome -due to the lack of precise data on energy use, costs and alternatives- is frequently missing opportunities to do things differently by the decision makers |
| + | *Humanitarian agencies should commit to reduce the footprint of their emissions in the host countries -as part of the ''''''do no harm'''''' policy-. Thus, by following the ''''''3M strategy'''''': |
| + | |
| + | #''<u>Measuring</u>'': Collecting energy and emission data |
| + | #<u>''Monitoring''</u>: Reporting of the collected data and identifying 'low-hanging fruit' where improvements would pay pack an initial investment in a short period |
| + | #<u>''Motivating''</u>: introducing emissions reduction targets as key performance indicators - encouraging entrepreneurial activities by country teams |
| + | |
| + | <br/> |
| + | |
| + | = How Can Donors Participate in Improving Energy Sustainability in the Humanitarian Agencies? = |
| + | |
| + | #Demanding humanitarian agencies to provide a breakdown of energy cost projections in budgets, and backing them up with assumptions about consumption and costs. |
| + | #Investigating what is actually being done by which agencies to reduce fuel costs and emissions in the country of operation. |
| + | #Supporing the scaling-up schemes, which have already proven feasibility. |
| + | #Providing guarantees which enable and improve contracting performance with the private sector. |
| + | |
| + | <br/> |
| + | |
| + | = The Roles of Local Governments & Host Countries = |
| + | |
| + | #Check the steps -if any- taken by the humanitarian agencies to reduce their vehicle impact & greenhouse gas emissions. |
| + | #To include and enforce sustainable energy as a priority sector, which will consequently encourage donors to invest in energy projects, leaving a positive and sustainable legacy in the country of operation.<br/> |
| + | #To facilitate infrastructure investments, which will reduce energy and water demand in camps, which fall under the state of prolonged displacement presence.<br/> |
| + | #Considering partnerships with humanitarian agencies, which are operating in remote locations of the country, in order to improve energy access for such locations.<br/> |
| + | |
| + | <br/> |
| + | |
| + | = Related Topics = |
| + | |
| + | *[https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2018-12-10-Costs-Humanitarian-Aid2.pdf The Costs of Fuelling Humanitarian Aid Full Report] |
| + | *[https://mei.chathamhouse.org/costs-fuelling-humanitarian-aid The Costs of Fuelling Humanitarian Aid Summary] |
| + | *[[The_Moving_Energy_Initiative|The Moving Energy Initiative]] |
| + | *[[A_Global_Plan_of_Action_-_Background,_Visions_and_Outcomes|Global Plan of Action]] |
| + | *[[File:MEI_toolkit_Powering_Ahead_2018_12.pdf|Powering Ahead: Improving How We Use and Account for Energy in Humanitarian Operations]] |