|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | | | |
| | [[File:NAE Overview Page.png|center|800px|NAE Overview Page|alt=NAE Overview Page]] | | [[File:NAE Overview Page.png|center|800px|NAE Overview Page|alt=NAE Overview Page]] |
| − | | + | <p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color:#003399;">'''<u>Category Dashboard:</u>'''</span></p> |
| | {{NAE Banner}} | | {{NAE Banner}} |
| | | | |
| | <br/> | | <br/> |
| | | | |
| − | = Content<br/> = | + | = Key Messages<br/> = |
| | + | |
| | + | *<span style="color:#FF8C00;">'''Categorization allows National Electrification Approaches to be presented and compared systematically'''</span><br/> |
| | + | *<span style="color:#FF8C00;">'''NEAs combine technologies, delivery models, regulation, financial and other interventions – most effective approaches include actions in all these areas'''</span> |
| | + | *<span style="color:#FF8C00;">'''There is no one ideal approach to electrification. Successful NEA elements are well alighted with each otehr and national context'''</span> |
| | + | *<span style="color:#FF8C00;">'''NEA should change over time as levels of electrification increase'''</span><br/> |
| | + | *<span style="color:#FF8C00;">'''Major advances in electrification can be achieved in just a few years given commitment from policy makers.'''</span> |
| | + | |
| | + | = Content of the NAE Tool<br/> = |
| | | | |
| | #Introduction<br/> | | #Introduction<br/> |
| | #What are National Electrification Approaches? | | #What are National Electrification Approaches? |
| − | #How to use this Review tool | + | #How to use this Review Tool |
| | #Categorization of National Electrification Approaches | | #Categorization of National Electrification Approaches |
| − | #Category Dashboard and information on categories | + | #Category Dashboard and Information on Categories |
| | #Example Table and Country Case Studies<br/> | | #Example Table and Country Case Studies<br/> |
| − | #*Bangladesh, Brazil, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Nepal, Peru, Philippines, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia,Vietnam<br/> | + | #*Bangladesh<br/> |
| | + | #*Brazil<br/> |
| | + | #*Cambodia<br/> |
| | + | #*Costa Rica<br/> |
| | + | #*Ethiopia<br/> |
| | + | #*Kenya<br/> |
| | + | #*Mali<br/> |
| | + | #*Nepal<br/> |
| | + | #*Peru<br/> |
| | + | #*Philippines<br/> |
| | + | #*Rwanda<br/> |
| | + | #*South Africa<br/> |
| | + | #*Tanzania<br/> |
| | + | #*Tunisia,Vietnam<br/> |
| | | | |
| − | = Download<br/> =
| + | <br/> |
| | | | |
| − | *The tool is a Powerpoint in full screen slide show: [[File:National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|center|180px|National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|alt=National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx]]
| + | = What are National Electrification Approches (NAE)? = |
| | + | |
| | + | == Definition<br/> == |
| | + | |
| | + | <span style="color:#006400;"></span>''"An approach adopted by national authorities to increase electricity access in a country."'' |
| | + | |
| | + | *NEA are based on and driven by government policies<br/> |
| | + | *An initiative by a business or NGO alone will not qualify as an NEA<br/> |
| | + | *Most NEA are based on explicit government policies and interventions, but a policy of non-intervention (eg a decision not to regulate) may also be part of an NEA<br/> |
| | + | *NEA may consist of a multi-faceted programme combining policies, financing and interventions or just of a single policy or intervention |
| | | | |
| | <br/> | | <br/> |
| | | | |
| − | = Introduction = | + | == Boundaries == |
| | + | |
| | + | The purpose of this Option Review Tool is to support analysis of NEA and assist in identifying options and so improving NEA design. |
| | | | |
| | <br/> | | <br/> |
| | + | |
| | + | <u>A country may have more than one NEA and a critical first step is to set boundaries around the NEA</u>: |
| | | | |
| | <br/> | | <br/> |
| | + | |
| | + | *These need to be wide enough to include policies and interventions which interact |
| | + | *<u>But</u> they need to be narrow enough to support meaningful analysis (impossible if every category of NEA activity is included) |
| | + | <div><br/></div> |
| | + | There are no absolute rules, but some suggestions: |
| | + | |
| | + | *Set time boundaries – Approaches change over time |
| | + | *Consider looking at one technology <u>or</u> one type of delivery model at a time |
| | + | *Are different approaches most relevant in different areas of the country (eg urban/rural or regions) or for different user groups (households, SMEs etc)? |
| | + | *Do not split single, coherent, programmes designed to include multiple categories |
| | + | |
| | + | *Set boundaries iteratively – aim to include 1(at most 2) types of technology, delivery model, legal basis and form of tariff regulation - and revise boundaries to optimise the balance between encompassing relevant aspects and ease of analysis. |
| | | | |
| | <br/> | | <br/> |
| | | | |
| − | = Key Messages<br/> = | + | = Downloading the Tool<br/> = |
| | | | |
| − | *'''Categorization allows National Electrification Approaches (NEA) to be presented and compared systematically'''<br/> | + | *The tool is is available to download as a Powerpoint in full screen slide show: [[File:National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|center|180px|National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx|alt=National Approaches to Electrification - Review of Options.pptx]] |
| − | *'''NEAs combine technologies, delivery models, regulation, financial and other interventions – most effective approaches include actions in all these areas'''
| + | |
| − | *'''There is no one ideal approach to electrification. Successful NEA elements are well alighted with each otehr and national context'''
| + | |
| − | *'''NEA should change over time as levels of electrification increase'''<br/>
| + | |
| − | *'''Major advances in electrification can be achieved in just a few years given commitment from policy makers.'''<br/>
| + | |
| | | | |
| | <br/> | | <br/> |
| | + | |
| | + | = Introduction = |
| | + | |
| | + | <br/> |
| | + | |
| | + | <br/> |
| | + | |
| | + | <br/> |
| | + | |
| | + | = <br/> = |
| | | | |
| | = Further Information<br/> = | | = Further Information<br/> = |
| Line 79: |
Line 131: |
| | <br/>[[File:NAE Overview Page.png|center|800px|NAE Overview Page|alt=NAE Overview Page]]<br/> | | <br/>[[File:NAE Overview Page.png|center|800px|NAE Overview Page|alt=NAE Overview Page]]<br/> |
| | | | |
| − | [[Category:Rural_Electrification]]
| |
| − | [[Category:NAE]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Electricity]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Tools]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Policies_and_Regulations]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Bangladesh]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Brazil]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Cambodia]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Costa_Rica]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Ethiopia]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Kenya]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Peru]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Vietnam]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Tunisia]]
| |
| − | [[Category:South_Africa]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Tanzania]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Philippines]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Rwanda]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Mali]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Nepal]]
| |
| | [[Category:SPIS_Toolbox]] | | [[Category:SPIS_Toolbox]] |
| | + | [[Category:Nepal]] |
| | + | [[Category:Mali]] |
| | + | [[Category:Rwanda]] |
| | + | [[Category:Philippines]] |
| | + | [[Category:Tanzania]] |
| | + | [[Category:South_Africa]] |
| | + | [[Category:Tunisia]] |
| | + | [[Category:Vietnam]] |
| | + | [[Category:Peru]] |
| | + | [[Category:Kenya]] |
| | + | [[Category:Ethiopia]] |
| | + | [[Category:Costa_Rica]] |
| | + | [[Category:Cambodia]] |
| | + | [[Category:Brazil]] |
| | + | [[Category:Bangladesh]] |
| | + | [[Category:Policies_and_Regulations]] |
| | + | [[Category:Tools]] |
| | + | [[Category:Electricity]] |
| | + | [[Category:NAE]] |
| | + | [[Category:Rural_Electrification]] |
The purpose of this Option Review Tool is to support analysis of NEA and assist in identifying options and so improving NEA design.
The Review was prepared by Mary Willcox and Dean Cooper of Practical Action Consulting working with Hadley Taylor, Silvia Cabriolu-Poddu and Christina Stuart of the EU Energy Initiative Partnership Dialogue Facility (EUEIPDF) and Michael Koeberlein and Caspar Priesemann of the Energising Development Programme (EnDev). It is based on a literature review, stakeholder consultations and development of the NEA categorization system used in the Review Tool.
A wider range of stakeholders were consulted during its preparation and we would particularly like to thank the following for their valuable contributions and insights:
