|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | | | |
| | {{Revision|(Red highlighted links don't have an existance web page. Please provide the link address).}} | | {{Revision|(Red highlighted links don't have an existance web page. Please provide the link address).}} |
| | + | |
| | | | |
| | = Introduction = | | = Introduction = |
| | | | |
| − | The Impacts Monitoring Group of [[Energising Development (EnDev)|Energising Development has]] developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments. | + | The Impacts Monitoring Group of [[Energising Development (EnDev)|Energising Development has]] developed recommendations for a "proper" impact assessments. |
| | | | |
| | We recommend to: | | We recommend to: |
| − | page
| + | |
| − | *use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|'''list of indicators''']] | + | <br/> |
| − | *conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy | + | *use the recommended [[Indicator rural electrification and stoves|list of indicators]] |
| − | *use a [[Theory Based Approach|'''theory based approach''']] by applying the result chain for developing the study design | + | *conduct '''baseline studies '''before project intervention and impact studies after households, social infrastructure or SMEs got access to a form of modern energy |
| − | *use a [[Mixed Methods|'''mixed methods approach''']]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions) | + | *use a [[Theory Based Approach|theory based approach]] by applying the result chain for developing the study design |
| − | *include [[Control Groups|'''control groups''']] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study | + | *use a [[Mixed Methods|mixed methods approach]]: the logic of the comparative advantages of [[Methoden|methods]]: that means the mix of quantitative (standarised household interviews) and qualitative methods (open/ semi-structured interviews with key persons and households or focus group discussions) |
| − | *consider [[Research Ethics|'''research ethics''']] | + | *include [[Control Groups|control groups]] if possible (households which do not have acces to modern energy) into your baseline and impact study |
| | + | *consider [[Research Ethics|research ethics]] |
| | | | |
| | The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support. | | The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support. |
The following tables show typical steps for baseline and impact studies, which we would recommend and support.
| Tasks
|
Materials/ Support
|
Library
|
| Terms for Consultants/ Enumerators
|
- Sample Terms for national / international consultants
- Sample Terms for enumerators
|
ToR Consultants:
|
| Selection Consultant/ Enumerators
|
|
|
| Study of available documents and statistics on national development goals and policies, national sector goals and policies, BMZ goals and concept for the partner country
|
- Checklist on relevant development goals
|
|
| Developing of Results Chains/ Indicators (consider
undesired side effects being positive or negative)
|
|
Rural Electrifciation:
Cooking:
|
| Developing of Questionnaires, interview guidelines, PRA tools (MAPP), observation criteria and other tools (catalogue of methods)
|
|
Example Questionnaires
PRA tools, Interview Guidelines, Observation criteria etc.
(Impact Studies Material)
|
| Sampling/ Selection target Group
|
|
|
| Training of Supervisors and Enumerators/ Pretesting
|
- Training Material
- Training Agenda
|
|
