|
|
Line 75: |
Line 75: |
| | | |
| <br/> | | <br/> |
| + | |
| | | |
| = Economy General<br/> = | | = Economy General<br/> = |
| | | |
| *1 Euro ~ 14 south African Rand (ZAR) (January 2014). | | *1 Euro ~ 14 south African Rand (ZAR) (January 2014). |
− | *GDP ~ 3080 Billion ZAR ~ 280 Billion Euro.<br/> | + | *GDP ~ 3080 Billion ZAR ~ 280 Billion Euro. |
− | *Exports amounted to 24% of GDP in 2010.<br/> | + | *Exports amounted to 24% of GDP in 2010. |
− | *Large and active stock exchange that ranks 17th in the world.<ref>Sources: World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org/country/south-africafckLRUS Department of State – Background note South Africa, fckLRhttp://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2898.htmfckLR</ref><br/> | + | *Large and active stock exchange that ranks 17th in the world.<ref>Sources: World Bank, http://data.worldbank.org/country/south-africafckLRUS Department of State – Background note South Africa, fckLRhttp://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2898.htmfckLR</ref> |
− | *Active member of BRICS<br/> | + | *Active member of BRICS |
− | *BRICS is an international political organisation of leading emerging economies with a developing middle income status and it comprises of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. | + | *BRICS is an international political organisation of leading emerging economies with a developing middle income status and it comprises of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.<br/> |
− | | + | |
− | <br/> | + | |
− | | + | |
| | | |
| == Hydropower == | | == Hydropower == |
| | | |
− | In South Africa there are 1086 large dams in operation: 846 embankments and 240 concrete dams. The total water storage of all dams is about 31,6 km3, which is about 65% of the mean annual runoff of South African rivers. | + | In South Africa there are 1086 large dams in operation: 846 embankments and 240 concrete dams. The total water storage of all dams is about 31,6 km3, which is about 65% of the mean annual runoff of South African rivers. |
| | | |
| <u>Large hydro</u> | | <u>Large hydro</u> |
| | | |
− | In 2012 electricity production from hydropower was 3147 GWh (1,4%) and in an average year it is 3000 GWh. The economically feasible capacity is 4700 GWh/year. Of the technically feasible potential about 90% has been developed so far (including pumped-storage). Almost all feasible large-scale hydro potential has now been tapped. [[file://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Hydropower.docx#_ftn1|[1]]] | + | In 2012 electricity production from hydropower was 3147 GWh (1,4%) and in an average year it is 3000 GWh. The economically feasible capacity is 4700 GWh/year. Of the technically feasible potential about 90% has been developed so far (including pumped-storage). Almost all feasible large-scale hydro potential has now been tapped. [[File://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Hydropower.docx|180px|[1]|alt=[1]]] |
| | | |
| <u>Pumped-storage</u> | | <u>Pumped-storage</u> |
Line 110: |
Line 108: |
| <u>Hydropower from neighbouring countries</u> | | <u>Hydropower from neighbouring countries</u> |
| | | |
− | The Southern African Power Pool (SAPP) allows and supports the free trading of electricity between Southern African Development Community (SADC) member countries, providing South Africa with access to the vast hydropower potential in the countries to the north, notably the significant potential in the Zambezi River. | + | The Southern African Power Pool (SAPP) allows and supports the free trading of electricity between Southern African Development Community (SADC) member countries, providing South Africa with access to the vast hydropower potential in the countries to the north, notably the significant potential in the Zambezi River. |
| <div><br/> | | <div><br/> |
| ---- | | ---- |
| <div id="ftn1"> | | <div id="ftn1"> |
− | [[file://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Hydropower.docx#_ftnref1|[1]]] Hydropower & Dams World Atlas, 2013 (page 108) | + | [[File://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Hydropower.docx|180px|[1]|alt=[1]]] Hydropower & Dams World Atlas, 2013 (page 108) |
| </div></div> | | </div></div> |
| <br/> | | <br/> |
| | | |
| + | <br/> |
| | | |
| == Solar Energy == | | == Solar Energy == |
Line 139: |
Line 138: |
| <br/> | | <br/> |
| | | |
| + | <br/> |
| | | |
| == Biomass == | | == Biomass == |
Line 144: |
Line 144: |
| South Africa has tremendous biofuel potential when considering the capacity to grow total plant biomass (all lignocellulosic plant biomass. According to conservative estimates, South Africa produces about 18 million tonnes of agricultural and forestry residues every year. The South African biofuels target for 2008‐2013, according to Industrial Biofuels Strategy (2007), has been fixed at 2% penetration level in the national liquid fuel supply, which corresponds to 400 million litres per annum. When considering the use of 50‐70% of this plant biomass with second generation biochemical and thermochemical technologies, South Africa has the potential to substitute the bulk of its current liquid fossil fuel usage (currently 21.2 BL/annum) with renewable biofuels. However, the only real activity has been US$437 million investment by the South Africa’s Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) and Energy Development Corporation (EDC) in two biofuels projects that will collectively produce 190 million litres of bioethanol from sugarcane and sugarbeet.<ref>http://cleantechsolutions.wordpress.com/2011/12/27/biomass-energy-in-south-africa/</ref> | | South Africa has tremendous biofuel potential when considering the capacity to grow total plant biomass (all lignocellulosic plant biomass. According to conservative estimates, South Africa produces about 18 million tonnes of agricultural and forestry residues every year. The South African biofuels target for 2008‐2013, according to Industrial Biofuels Strategy (2007), has been fixed at 2% penetration level in the national liquid fuel supply, which corresponds to 400 million litres per annum. When considering the use of 50‐70% of this plant biomass with second generation biochemical and thermochemical technologies, South Africa has the potential to substitute the bulk of its current liquid fossil fuel usage (currently 21.2 BL/annum) with renewable biofuels. However, the only real activity has been US$437 million investment by the South Africa’s Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) and Energy Development Corporation (EDC) in two biofuels projects that will collectively produce 190 million litres of bioethanol from sugarcane and sugarbeet.<ref>http://cleantechsolutions.wordpress.com/2011/12/27/biomass-energy-in-south-africa/</ref> |
| | | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| == <span data-scayt_word="biogas" data-scaytid="48">Biogas</span> == | | == <span data-scayt_word="biogas" data-scaytid="48">Biogas</span> == |
Line 150: |
Line 150: |
| <u>Waste in South Africa</u> | | <u>Waste in South Africa</u> |
| | | |
− | The third national waste baseline shows the amount of waste generated in South Africa in 2011. | + | The third national waste baseline shows the amount of waste generated in South Africa in 2011. |
| | | |
− | {| width="612" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" | + | {| style="width: 612px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 432px;" | | | | style="width: 432px;" | |
− | Waste cathegory[[file://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx#_ftn1|[1]]] | + | Waste cathegory[[File://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx|180px|[1]|alt=[1]]] |
| | | |
| | style="width: 83px;" | | | | style="width: 83px;" | |
Line 174: |
Line 174: |
| | | |
| | style="width: 37px;" | | | | style="width: 37px;" | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| | style="width: 60px;" | | | | style="width: 60px;" | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
Line 187: |
Line 187: |
| | | |
| | style="width: 37px;" | | | | style="width: 37px;" | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| | style="width: 60px;" | | | | style="width: 60px;" | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
Line 197: |
Line 197: |
| | | |
| | style="width: 83px;" | | | | style="width: 83px;" | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| | style="width: 37px;" | | | | style="width: 37px;" | |
Line 203: |
Line 203: |
| | | |
| | style="width: 60px;" | | | | style="width: 60px;" | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
Line 220: |
Line 220: |
| | | |
| | style="width: 60px;" | | | | style="width: 60px;" | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 432px;" | | | | style="width: 432px;" | |
− | '''General waste: '''''means waste that does not pose an immediate hazard or threat to health or the environment, and includes: domestic waste, building and demolition waste; business waste; and inert waste. | + | '''General waste: '''''means waste that does not pose an immediate hazard or threat to health or the environment, and includes: domestic waste, building and demolition waste; business waste; and inert waste.'' |
| | | |
| | style="width: 83px;" | | | | style="width: 83px;" | |
− | '''59 | + | '''59''' |
| | | |
| | style="width: 37px;" | | | | style="width: 37px;" | |
Line 272: |
Line 272: |
| | | |
| | style="width: 60px;" | | | | style="width: 60px;" | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| |- | | |- |
Line 302: |
Line 302: |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 432px;" | | | | style="width: 432px;" | |
− | food waste generated by | + | food waste generated by |
− | *4% by consumers, | + | *4% by consumers, |
− | *17% by distribution | + | *17% by distribution |
| *27% by processing & packaging | | *27% by processing & packaging |
− | *26% by agricultural production | + | *26% by agricultural production |
| *26% by post harvest handling & storage | | *26% by post harvest handling & storage |
| | | |
Line 312: |
Line 312: |
| 9 | | 9 |
| | | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| | style="width: 37px;" | | | | style="width: 37px;" | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| | style="width: 60px;" | | | | style="width: 60px;" | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | Waste in the commercial and industrial waste category has been excluded from the total amount of general waste generated to avoid double counting in the baseline report (DEA, 2012). Waste management still largely relies on landfills at 80-90% of waste. In South Africa, landfill remains the cheapest waste disposal option, although the costs are increasing. | + | Waste in the commercial and industrial waste category has been excluded from the total amount of general waste generated to avoid double counting in the baseline report (DEA, 2012). Waste management still largely relies on landfills at 80-90% of waste. In South Africa, landfill remains the cheapest waste disposal option, although the costs are increasing. |
| | | |
− | The National Waste Management Strategy has set ambitious targets to establish 2600 small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and 69000 new jobs from the waste sector by 2016. There are significant opportunities to increase recovery of waste, and divert waste from landfills. This would require innovation funding models for such projects, and present an opportunity to increase the contribution of the informal sectors and the private sectors.[[file://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx#_ftn2|[2]]] | + | The National Waste Management Strategy has set ambitious targets to establish 2600 small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and 69000 new jobs from the waste sector by 2016. There are significant opportunities to increase recovery of waste, and divert waste from landfills. This would require innovation funding models for such projects, and present an opportunity to increase the contribution of the informal sectors and the private sectors.[[File://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx|180px|[2]|alt=[2]]] |
| | | |
| <u>Biogas</u> | | <u>Biogas</u> |
| | | |
− | Because of the changing regulatory framework, there is increasing use of biogas across South Africa and a number of digesters are either completed or planned. This is linked to government incentives for renewable energy production and increasing costs of waste management as well as stricter regulations. | + | Because of the changing regulatory framework, there is increasing use of biogas across South Africa and a number of digesters are either completed or planned. This is linked to government incentives for renewable energy production and increasing costs of waste management as well as stricter regulations. |
| | | |
| <u>REI4P</u> | | <u>REI4P</u> |
| | | |
− | REIPPPP replaced the Renewable Energy Feed in Tariff programme where prospective producers of sites with capacity over 5 MW must bid and the producer with the lowest feed in tariff wins. The bidding is done bi-annually. This provides a potential source of financial and operational support for biogas and landfill. A separate programme called The Small Projects IPP Procurement Programme had being developed for projects under 5 MW. The DoE issued Request for Information documents for small-scale renewable energy projects (15 June 2012).[[file://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx#_ftn3|[3]]] | + | REIPPPP replaced the Renewable Energy Feed in Tariff programme where prospective producers of sites with capacity over 5 MW must bid and the producer with the lowest feed in tariff wins. The bidding is done bi-annually. This provides a potential source of financial and operational support for biogas and landfill. A separate programme called The Small Projects IPP Procurement Programme had being developed for projects under 5 MW. The DoE issued Request for Information documents for small-scale renewable energy projects (15 June 2012).[[File://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx|180px|[3]|alt=[3]]] |
| | | |
| <u>Industry associations</u> | | <u>Industry associations</u> |
Line 340: |
Line 340: |
| ---- | | ---- |
| <div id="ftn1"> | | <div id="ftn1"> |
− | [[file://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx#_ftnref1|[1]]] [http://sawic.environment.gov.za/documents/1880.pdf http://sawic.environment.gov.za/documents/1880.pdf] | + | [[File://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx|180px|[1]|alt=[1]]] [http://sawic.environment.gov.za/documents/1880.pdf http://sawic.environment.gov.za/documents/1880.pdf] |
| </div><div id="ftn2"> | | </div><div id="ftn2"> |
− | [[file://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx#_ftnref2|[2]]] [http://green-cape.co.za/assets/Uploads/GreenCape-MIR-Waste.pdf http://green-cape.co.za/assets/Uploads/GreenCape-MIR-Waste.pdf] | + | [[File://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx|180px|[2]|alt=[2]]] [http://green-cape.co.za/assets/Uploads/GreenCape-MIR-Waste.pdf http://green-cape.co.za/assets/Uploads/GreenCape-MIR-Waste.pdf] |
| </div><div id="ftn3"> | | </div><div id="ftn3"> |
− | [[file://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx#_ftnref3|[3]]] [http://southafrica.nlembassy.org/binaries/content/assets/postenweb/z/zuid_afrika/netherlands-embassy-in-pretoria/import/the_embassy/economic-affairs/waste-to-energy-intro.pdf http://southafrica.nlembassy.org/binaries/content/assets/postenweb/z/zuid_afrika/netherlands-embassy-in-pretoria/import/the_embassy/economic-affairs/waste-to-energy-intro.pdf] | + | [[File://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Energypedia South Africa/Biogas.docx|180px|[3]|alt=[3]]] [http://southafrica.nlembassy.org/binaries/content/assets/postenweb/z/zuid_afrika/netherlands-embassy-in-pretoria/import/the_embassy/economic-affairs/waste-to-energy-intro.pdf http://southafrica.nlembassy.org/binaries/content/assets/postenweb/z/zuid_afrika/netherlands-embassy-in-pretoria/import/the_embassy/economic-affairs/waste-to-energy-intro.pdf] |
| </div></div> | | </div></div> |
− | | + | <br/> |
− | | + | |
| | | |
| == Wind Energy == | | == Wind Energy == |
Line 367: |
Line 366: |
| The Department of Energy launched the REI4P in 2011 and aims to award power purchase agreements for projects with an overall capacity of 3725 MW to be installed by the end of 2016. Provision has been made for five consecutive bidding windows. Preferred bidders under windows 1 and 2 have reached financial close while preferred bidders under window three have been announced. In total, 62 wind projects have been allocated under the first three windows. The total allocation to wind energy for the REI4P programme amounts to 3 320 MW of which 1 984 MW was allocated under the first three bidding windows. In line with the revised IRP, an additional annual allocation of 1000 MW to wind will be made from 2014 onwards. The price of wind energy has also steadily decreased: | | The Department of Energy launched the REI4P in 2011 and aims to award power purchase agreements for projects with an overall capacity of 3725 MW to be installed by the end of 2016. Provision has been made for five consecutive bidding windows. Preferred bidders under windows 1 and 2 have reached financial close while preferred bidders under window three have been announced. In total, 62 wind projects have been allocated under the first three windows. The total allocation to wind energy for the REI4P programme amounts to 3 320 MW of which 1 984 MW was allocated under the first three bidding windows. In line with the revised IRP, an additional annual allocation of 1000 MW to wind will be made from 2014 onwards. The price of wind energy has also steadily decreased: |
| | | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| {| style="width: 99%;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" | | {| style="width: 99%;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" |
Line 424: |
Line 423: |
| Wind projects show an average price decrease of 42%[[File://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Wind/DRAFT 6 - Wind power fact sheet ATG MB.docx|180px|[iii]|alt=[iii]]] and are cheaper than electricity from Medupi. – current wind energy costs 74 ZAR cents per kilowatt hour on average (van den Bergh, 2014). The current 62 wind energy projects created an estimated 19.108 FTE for construction and 34.936 for O&M (or 1.747 permanent jobs for 20 years). Wind energy projects also showed steady increases in local content across the three bidding windows: | | Wind projects show an average price decrease of 42%[[File://za.giz.de/gizdfs/Redirected/zaGarcia/My Documents/SAGEN/Wind/DRAFT 6 - Wind power fact sheet ATG MB.docx|180px|[iii]|alt=[iii]]] and are cheaper than electricity from Medupi. – current wind energy costs 74 ZAR cents per kilowatt hour on average (van den Bergh, 2014). The current 62 wind energy projects created an estimated 19.108 FTE for construction and 34.936 for O&M (or 1.747 permanent jobs for 20 years). Wind energy projects also showed steady increases in local content across the three bidding windows: |
| | | |
− | | + | <br/> |
| | | |
| {| style="width: 99%;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" | | {| style="width: 99%;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" |
Line 496: |
Line 495: |
| Other wind farms include Red Cap Gibson Bay, Longyuan Mulio De Aar 2 north wind, Nojoli, Khobab, Noupoort and Loeriesfontein.<ref>http://www.windlab.com/node/360</ref> | | Other wind farms include Red Cap Gibson Bay, Longyuan Mulio De Aar 2 north wind, Nojoli, Khobab, Noupoort and Loeriesfontein.<ref>http://www.windlab.com/node/360</ref> |
| | | |
| + | <br/> |
| | | |
| == <span style="line-height: 23.63px; font-size: 19.09px;">Geothermal Energy</span> == | | == <span style="line-height: 23.63px; font-size: 19.09px;">Geothermal Energy</span> == |