|
|
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | *<span>"Savings of 9 tonnes of CO2 equivalent GHG emissions within a 20-year period of use of one single 50 Wp SHS"; </span><span>=> '''0.45 t CO2/year<ref>Posorski, Rolf et al.: Does the use of Solar Home Systems (SHS) contribute to climate protection?, 2002, Renewable Energy, Volume 28, Number 7, June 2003, pp. 1061-1080 (20).</ref>'''</span> | | *<span>"Savings of 9 tonnes of CO2 equivalent GHG emissions within a 20-year period of use of one single 50 Wp SHS"; </span><span>=> '''0.45 t CO2/year<ref>Posorski, Rolf et al.: Does the use of Solar Home Systems (SHS) contribute to climate protection?, 2002, Renewable Energy, Volume 28, Number 7, June 2003, pp. 1061-1080 (20).</ref>'''</span> |
| | *<span>"Typical SHS of 10-50 Wp will directly displace roughly '''0.15-0.30 tons of CO2''' per year through fuel substitutions mostly of kerosene."<ref>REPP: Steven Kaufman: Rural Electrification with Solar Energy as a Climate Protection Strategy, Research Report No. 9, 2000.</ref></span> | | *<span>"Typical SHS of 10-50 Wp will directly displace roughly '''0.15-0.30 tons of CO2''' per year through fuel substitutions mostly of kerosene."<ref>REPP: Steven Kaufman: Rural Electrification with Solar Energy as a Climate Protection Strategy, Research Report No. 9, 2000.</ref></span> |
| − | *<span>"</span><span>During a previous analysis of 8 case studies, it was found roughly '''0.25 tons of CO2''' per average system of 44 Wp per year would represent a conservative but reasonable global value. […] 70% of the analysed emission reductions were actually higher than 250 kg."<ref>Martens et al. (2001): Towards a streamlined CDM process for Solar Home Systems.</ref></span><span /> | + | *<span>"</span><span>During a previous analysis of 8 case studies, it was found roughly '''0.25 tons of CO2''' per average system of 44 Wp per year would represent a conservative but reasonable global value. […] 70% of the analysed emission reductions were actually higher than 250 kg."<ref>Martens et al. (2001): Towards a streamlined CDM process for Solar Home Systems.</ref></span> |
| | | | |
| | = Further Reading = | | = Further Reading = |
Revision as of 13:55, 28 June 2010
GHG reduction potential of SHS
- "Savings of 9 tonnes of CO2 equivalent GHG emissions within a 20-year period of use of one single 50 Wp SHS"; => 0.45 t CO2/year[1]
- "Typical SHS of 10-50 Wp will directly displace roughly 0.15-0.30 tons of CO2 per year through fuel substitutions mostly of kerosene."[2]
- "During a previous analysis of 8 case studies, it was found roughly 0.25 tons of CO2 per average system of 44 Wp per year would represent a conservative but reasonable global value. […] 70% of the analysed emission reductions were actually higher than 250 kg."[3]
Further Reading
Posorski, Rolf et al.: Does the use of Solar Home Systems (SHS) contribute to climate protection?, 2002, Renewable Energy, Volume 28, Number 7, June 2003, pp. 1061-1080 (20).
REPP: Steven Kaufman: Rural Electrification with Solar Energy as a Climate Protection Strategy, Research Report No. 9, 2000.
Martens et al. (2001): Towards a streamlined CDM process for Solar Home Systems.
References
- ↑ Posorski, Rolf et al.: Does the use of Solar Home Systems (SHS) contribute to climate protection?, 2002, Renewable Energy, Volume 28, Number 7, June 2003, pp. 1061-1080 (20).
- ↑ REPP: Steven Kaufman: Rural Electrification with Solar Energy as a Climate Protection Strategy, Research Report No. 9, 2000.
- ↑ Martens et al. (2001): Towards a streamlined CDM process for Solar Home Systems.
⇒ Back to Solar Section
