|
|
| Line 23: |
Line 23: |
| | *higher credit risk. | | *higher credit risk. |
| | | | |
| − | === '''<span style="color:#879637;">Outcome/Product</span>''' === | + | ==== '''<span style="color:#879637;">Outcome/Product</span>''' ==== |
| | | | |
| | *Study on potential of financing SPIS and recommendations for financial service provider. | | *Study on potential of financing SPIS and recommendations for financial service provider. |
| | | | |
| − | === '''<span style="color:#879637;">Data Requirements</span>''' === | + | ==== '''<span style="color:#879637;">Data Requirements</span>''' ==== |
| | | | |
| | *Profile end customers (cropping patterns, irrigation techniques, pumping systems, market); | | *Profile end customers (cropping patterns, irrigation techniques, pumping systems, market); |
| Line 35: |
Line 35: |
| | *Environmental impact assessment (long term perspective). | | *Environmental impact assessment (long term perspective). |
| | | | |
| − | === '''<span style="color:#879637;">People/Stakeholders</span>''' === | + | ==== '''<span style="color:#879637;">People/Stakeholders</span>''' ==== |
| | | | |
| | *Management of financial service providers; | | *Management of financial service providers; |
| Line 46: |
Line 46: |
| | *Service providers. | | *Service providers. |
| | | | |
| − | === '''<span style="color:#879637;">Important Issues</span>''' === | + | ==== '''<span style="color:#879637;">Important Issues</span>''' ==== |
| | | | |
| | *Solar-powered irrigation technology is mature, reliable and systems costs have decreased. | | *Solar-powered irrigation technology is mature, reliable and systems costs have decreased. |
| | *SPIS generally require higher investment cost than other irrigation system, but operation costs are lower. | | *SPIS generally require higher investment cost than other irrigation system, but operation costs are lower. |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| | {{SPIS Reference}} | | {{SPIS Reference}} |
Revision as of 06:45, 3 November 2017
|
Error: image is invalid or non-existent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Error creating thumbnail: convert: unable to open image `/var/www/ISWiki/prod/current/energypedia/images/9/97/Download.JPG': No such file or directory @ error/blob.c/OpenBlob/2641.
convert: no images defined `/tmp/transform_55f5b46-1.jpg' @ error/convert.c/ConvertImageCommand/3044.
|
|
Error creating thumbnail: convert: unable to open image `/var/www/ISWiki/prod/current/energypedia/images/9/97/Download.JPG': No such file or directory @ error/blob.c/OpenBlob/2641.
convert: no images defined `/tmp/transform_5363e9f-1.jpg' @ error/convert.c/ConvertImageCommand/3044.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Policy: Analyze Potential
Today, solar-powered irrigation is a technically mature and reliable option and an alternative to conventional irrigation approaches. When analyzing options for the development of credit policies for SPIS, the following aspects should be considered:
SPIS is likely to be a feasible option in a region if:
- energy provision for farming is a constraint (availability or cost of fuel, reliability of grid connection);
- an intensification of agricultural production is envisaged;
- producers are market-oriented and not working on subsistence level;
- producers are at least medium sized or organized in small holder groups;
- subsidized refinancing options for financial operators are available;
- grant schemes or subsidies are available to borrowers (producer);
- producers aim at specialized markets using environmental friendly technology (focusing on ecological production, which could give scope for premium pricing);
- technology distributors and system integrators available in the region;
- water is available and managed adequately so as to prevent groundwater depletion in the long run.
However, compared to conventional pumping and irrigation methods, PV-based pumping solutions have:
- a comparatively high initial capital investment requirement;
- longer repayment periods or/and significantly higher repayment rates;
- higher credit risk.
Outcome/Product
- Study on potential of financing SPIS and recommendations for financial service provider.
Data Requirements
- Profile end customers (cropping patterns, irrigation techniques, pumping systems, market);
- Current offer of loan products available for potential SPIS customer;
- Water and energy provision regime in region;
- Support/advice structures and subsidy schemes (refinancing) available for the region;
- Environmental impact assessment (long term perspective).
People/Stakeholders
- Management of financial service providers;
- Market analysts/consultants;
- Research and training institutions;
- Public entities promoting or/and subsidizing SPIS initiatives;
- Donors refinancing solar-powered initiatives;
- Associations of producers / potential borrowers;
- Technology providers;
- Service providers.
Important Issues
- Solar-powered irrigation technology is mature, reliable and systems costs have decreased.
- SPIS generally require higher investment cost than other irrigation system, but operation costs are lower.
