|
|
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | | {{Back to SPIS Toolbox 2}} | | | {{Back to SPIS Toolbox 2}} |
| | | | | | |
| − | | {{Back to finance}} | + | | {{Back to Finance}} |
| | | | | | |
| | | style="width: 150px; background-color: rgb(222, 226, 192);" | <span style="color:#000000;"><span style="font-size: 90%">'''[[SPIS_Toolbox_-_Credit_Policy:_Risk_Analysis|►Go to the Next Chapter]]</span></span> | | | style="width: 150px; background-color: rgb(222, 226, 192);" | <span style="color:#000000;"><span style="font-size: 90%">'''[[SPIS_Toolbox_-_Credit_Policy:_Risk_Analysis|►Go to the Next Chapter]]</span></span> |
Revision as of 14:23, 13 November 2017
|
Error: image is invalid or non-existent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Error creating thumbnail: convert: unable to open image `/var/www/ISWiki/prod/current/energypedia/images/9/97/Download.JPG': No such file or directory @ error/blob.c/OpenBlob/2641.
convert: no images defined `/tmp/transform_55446dc-1.jpg' @ error/convert.c/ConvertImageCommand/3044.
|
|
Error creating thumbnail: convert: unable to open image `/var/www/ISWiki/prod/current/energypedia/images/9/97/Download.JPG': No such file or directory @ error/blob.c/OpenBlob/2641.
convert: no images defined `/tmp/transform_3da8387-1.jpg' @ error/convert.c/ConvertImageCommand/3044.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Credit Policy: Analyze Potential
Today, solar-powered irrigation is a technically mature and reliable option and an alternative to conventional irrigation approaches. When analyzing options for the development of credit policies for SPIS, the following aspects should be considered:
SPIS is likely to be a feasible option in a region if:
- energy provision for farming is a constraint (availability or cost of fuel, reliability of grid connection);
- an intensification of agricultural production is envisaged;
- producers are market-oriented and not working on subsistence level;
- producers are at least medium sized or organized in small holder groups;
- subsidized refinancing options for financial operators are available;
- grant schemes or subsidies are available to borrowers (producer);
- producers aim at specialized markets using environmental friendly technology (focusing on ecological production, which could give scope for premium pricing);
- technology distributors and system integrators available in the region;
- water is available and managed adequately so as to prevent groundwater depletion in the long run.
However, compared to conventional pumping and irrigation methods, PV-based pumping solutions have:
- a comparatively high initial capital investment requirement;
- longer repayment periods or/and significantly higher repayment rates;
- higher credit risk.
Outcome/Product
- Study on potential of financing SPIS and recommendations for financial service provider.
Data Requirements
- Profile end customers (cropping patterns, irrigation techniques, pumping systems, market);
- Current offer of loan products available for potential SPIS customer;
- Water and energy provision regime in region;
- Support/advice structures and subsidy schemes (refinancing) available for the region;
- Environmental impact assessment (long term perspective).
People/Stakeholders
- Management of financial service providers;
- Market analysts/consultants;
- Research and training institutions;
- Public entities promoting or/and subsidizing SPIS initiatives;
- Donors refinancing solar-powered initiatives;
- Associations of producers / potential borrowers;
- Technology providers;
- Service providers.
Important Issues
- Solar-powered irrigation technology is mature, reliable and systems costs have decreased.
- SPIS generally require higher investment cost than other irrigation system, but operation costs are lower.
