|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| + | {{CES Country |
| + | |CES Country Name=Indonesia |
| + | |CES Country Capital=Jakarata |
| + | |CES Country Region=East Asia & Pacific |
| + | |CES Country Coordinates=6.1750° S, 106.8283° E |
| + | }} |
| + | = Introduction = |
| | | |
− | {| align="right" style="width: 400px; font-size: 14px;" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="5"
| + | The primary energy supply in Indonesia is mainly based on fossil fuels like oil, gas and carbon. In 2009, 43% of Indonesian energy consumption was based on oil, 19% on natural gas and, 34% on coal. Renewable energy, particularly hydro and geothermal have a share of 4%, but statistics do not cover the traditional use of biomass as energy for cooking, lighting and process heat in rural areas, which is estimated to comprise 21% up to 29% of the total energy demand. The focus on fossil fuels was caused by the low price of oil in the past due to own oil sources and prolonged price subsidies. In the meantime, the oil reserve decreased significantly. Considering the existing average production rate, it is estimated that the reserve oil will be exhausted in around 20 years. Indonesia, which had been a founding member of OPEC, but left the organisation in 2009, is now importing larg quantities of oil. On the other hand, Indonesia is still a net exporter of natural gas. That’s why the national utility PLN is switching now power generation from expensive oil to gas and coal of which Indonesia has large reserves. |
− | |-
| + | |
− | ! style="width: 602px; text-align: center; background-color: rgb(79, 129, 189);" colspan="4" scope="col" | <font color="#ffffff"><span style="line-height: 20px;">Republic of Indonesia</span></font>
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; text-align: center; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" rowspan="1" colspan="3" | [[File:Indonesia Flag.gif|center|180px|Flag of Indonesia|alt=Flag of _____.png]]
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; text-align: center; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | [[File:550px-Indonesia (orthographic projection).svg.png|center|180px|Indonesia Location|alt=Location _______.png]]
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Capital'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | Jakarta (6° 10′ 30″ S, 106° 49′ 42″ E)
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Official Languages(s)'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" |
| + | |
− | Indonesian
| + | |
| | | |
− | |-
| + | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Government'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | Unitary Presidential Republic
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''President'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Vice President'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | Boediono
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Total Area ''''''<span style="line-height: 21px;">( </span>km²<span style="line-height: 21px;">)</span>'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | 1,919,440
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Population'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | 237,556,363 (2010 census)
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Rural Population'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | <br/>
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''GDP (Nominal)'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | $670.421 billion (2010 estimate)
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''GDP Per Capita'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | $2,858
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Currency'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | Rupiah (IDR)
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Time Zone'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | UTC+7 to +9
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Calling Code'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | +62
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Electricity Generation'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | <span data-scayt_word="twh" data-scaytid="5">TWh</span>/year (year)
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Access to Electricity'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | <br/>
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Wind energy (installed capacity)'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | MW (year)
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" colspan="3" | '''Solar Energy (installed capacity)'''
| + | |
− | | style="width: 250px; background-color: rgb(219, 229, 241);" | MW (year) | + | |
− | |}
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | {| align="left" class="FCK__ShowTableBorders" style="width: 350px;" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1"
| + | |
− | |-
| + | |
− | | __TOC__
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | |}
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | <br/>
| + | |
− | <div style="clear: both;"></div>
| + | |
− | = Overview =
| + | |
− | | + | |
− | The primary energy supply in Indonesia is mainly based on fossil fuels like oil, gas and carbon. In 2009, 43% of Indonesian energy consumption was based on oil, 19% on natural gas and, 34% on coal. Renewable energy, particularly hydro and geothermal have a share of 4%, but statistics do not cover the traditional use of biomass as energy for cooking, lighting and process heat in rural areas, which is estimated to comprise 21% up to 29% of the total energy demand. The focus on fossil fuels was caused by the low price of oil in the past due to own oil sources and prolonged price subsidies. In the meantime, the oil reserve decreased significantly. Considering the existing average production rate, it is estimated that the reserve oil will be exhausted in around 20 years. Indonesia, which had been a founding member of OPEC, but left the organisation in 2009, is now importing larg quantities of oil. On the other hand, Indonesia is still a net exporter of natural gas. That’s why the national utility PLN is switching now power generation from expensive oil to gas and coal of which Indonesia has large reserves.
| + | |
| | | |
| = Energy Situation = | | = Energy Situation = |
Line 79: |
Line 17: |
| <br/>Subsides to the energy sector are one of the biggest items on the national budget. The combined fuel and electricity subsidies accounted for IDR 111.9 trillion in 2010. In the same year the government allocated IDR 57.46 trillion ($6.37 billion) for the fuel subsidy and the rest went to the state utility - PLN - as an operating subsidy in compensation for being compelled to sell electricity at below cost. Average generation cost in Indonesia are around 1200 IDR/kWh and reach up to 3000 IDR/kWh for diesel generated power in remote areas. Average selling price is around 700 IDR/kWh.<br/>In spite of abundant hydropower resources hydropower is only used to a small extent. According to a Hydro Power Potential Study conducted by PLN in 1982, the total potential capacity of hydropower resources in Indonesia is 75 GW. Yet, in 2008 the country had installed a total of 3,504 MW hydropower capacity, which represents a mere 4.7% of the technical potential and only 7.2% of the total Indonesian electricity generation capacity. The development of new hydropower plants for electricity generation remained slow. The contribution of hydropower towards the Indonesian energy mix has been falling steadily in the last years; from 13% in 1998 to 7.2% in 2008. | | <br/>Subsides to the energy sector are one of the biggest items on the national budget. The combined fuel and electricity subsidies accounted for IDR 111.9 trillion in 2010. In the same year the government allocated IDR 57.46 trillion ($6.37 billion) for the fuel subsidy and the rest went to the state utility - PLN - as an operating subsidy in compensation for being compelled to sell electricity at below cost. Average generation cost in Indonesia are around 1200 IDR/kWh and reach up to 3000 IDR/kWh for diesel generated power in remote areas. Average selling price is around 700 IDR/kWh.<br/>In spite of abundant hydropower resources hydropower is only used to a small extent. According to a Hydro Power Potential Study conducted by PLN in 1982, the total potential capacity of hydropower resources in Indonesia is 75 GW. Yet, in 2008 the country had installed a total of 3,504 MW hydropower capacity, which represents a mere 4.7% of the technical potential and only 7.2% of the total Indonesian electricity generation capacity. The development of new hydropower plants for electricity generation remained slow. The contribution of hydropower towards the Indonesian energy mix has been falling steadily in the last years; from 13% in 1998 to 7.2% in 2008. |
| | | |
− | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#Overview|Go To Top]] | + | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] |
| | | |
| = Electricity Situation = | | = Electricity Situation = |
− | <div>
| + | |
| Indonesia has a comparatively low overall rate of electrification for a middle-income country. Figures and interpretations diverge, but as much as 30- 35% of the population representing 75 million people does not have access to electricity. Around 50% of un-electrified people in Indonesia are actually living in (already) electrified areas and would need grid densification programmes. The costs are estimated to be US$ 290 per connection. The other half is living in non-electrified villages, which are mostly found in remote rural areas. Such areas can either be targeted through grid extension or dedicated off-grid solutions. The World Bank <u>Regional Electrification Master Plan for Indonesia made some estimation about least cost options coming to the following conclusions</u>: | | Indonesia has a comparatively low overall rate of electrification for a middle-income country. Figures and interpretations diverge, but as much as 30- 35% of the population representing 75 million people does not have access to electricity. Around 50% of un-electrified people in Indonesia are actually living in (already) electrified areas and would need grid densification programmes. The costs are estimated to be US$ 290 per connection. The other half is living in non-electrified villages, which are mostly found in remote rural areas. Such areas can either be targeted through grid extension or dedicated off-grid solutions. The World Bank <u>Regional Electrification Master Plan for Indonesia made some estimation about least cost options coming to the following conclusions</u>: |
| *Grid expansion is the least-cost means of electrification up to distances of around 7 km where good micro-hydro resources are available (assuming that sufficient grid-connected generation capacity is available) | | *Grid expansion is the least-cost means of electrification up to distances of around 7 km where good micro-hydro resources are available (assuming that sufficient grid-connected generation capacity is available) |
Line 93: |
Line 31: |
| Villagers in non-electrified areas rely on candles, kerosene lamps, dry cells and car batteries to satisfy part of their energy needs. Rural households typically spend a significant share of their income on these energy sources – despite the inconvenience and the environmental and health hazards associated with them.<br/>Whilst the application of MHP technology is not new to Indonesia, only a small proportion of the country’s huge mini and '''micro-hydro power (MHP)''' potential has been exploited so far. Unfavourable framework conditions for stand-alone systems and on-grid schemes, lack of specialist know-how and a basic lack of awareness of the available potential have been the main reasons for this sluggish progress in the past. However, in remote rural areas, hydro power is now becoming increasingly competitive compared to fossil fuel-powered alternatives, due to the high energy prices (which can be trice as high as in the centres) that neutralise the still existing fuel subsidies by the Indonesian Government.<br/>Other renewable energy technologies like Solar Home Systems, small wind turbines or [[Biomass Potential in the Indonesian Agroindustry|biogas plants and other bioenergies]] are spread to a different extend in rural areas, but lack for the technical maturity or sustainable operation and service models that are necessary for large scale dissemination. | | Villagers in non-electrified areas rely on candles, kerosene lamps, dry cells and car batteries to satisfy part of their energy needs. Rural households typically spend a significant share of their income on these energy sources – despite the inconvenience and the environmental and health hazards associated with them.<br/>Whilst the application of MHP technology is not new to Indonesia, only a small proportion of the country’s huge mini and '''micro-hydro power (MHP)''' potential has been exploited so far. Unfavourable framework conditions for stand-alone systems and on-grid schemes, lack of specialist know-how and a basic lack of awareness of the available potential have been the main reasons for this sluggish progress in the past. However, in remote rural areas, hydro power is now becoming increasingly competitive compared to fossil fuel-powered alternatives, due to the high energy prices (which can be trice as high as in the centres) that neutralise the still existing fuel subsidies by the Indonesian Government.<br/>Other renewable energy technologies like Solar Home Systems, small wind turbines or [[Biomass Potential in the Indonesian Agroindustry|biogas plants and other bioenergies]] are spread to a different extend in rural areas, but lack for the technical maturity or sustainable operation and service models that are necessary for large scale dissemination. |
| | | |
− | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#Overview|Go To Top]] | + | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] |
− | </div>
| + | |
| | | |
| = Policy Framework, Laws and Regulations<br/> = | | = Policy Framework, Laws and Regulations<br/> = |
Line 139: |
Line 76: |
| <br/>The Government of Indonesia has made a voluntary commitment to '''reduce the GHGs''' and pledges to reduce around 26 percent of Business as Usual emission in year 2020 by unilateral finance and it could be increased to 41 percent with international finance supports. To reach this target, the energy sector must play a role at least by reducing greenhouse gasses emission by 6% of the total emission reduction target.<br/>Since recently the GOI has also established a new allocation fund for rural electrification called Dana alokasi khusus DAK. The DAK was approved by the ministry of finance. The technical guidelines have been worked out by the DGEEU and have still to be approved by the MEMR. The current budget of DAK is 15 Mio US$. It will increase to 100 Mio US$ per year. DAK is providing 200,000 to 800,000 € to local governments. These governments can use the money to construct new MHPPs, rehabilitate MHPPs, extend the grid of MHPPs or install solar systems. The districts have to contribute at least 10% of the costs. Funds can only be used for hardware. The local governments have to design and construct the plant. Consultant activities are not included, but can partly be financed by the MEMR. | | <br/>The Government of Indonesia has made a voluntary commitment to '''reduce the GHGs''' and pledges to reduce around 26 percent of Business as Usual emission in year 2020 by unilateral finance and it could be increased to 41 percent with international finance supports. To reach this target, the energy sector must play a role at least by reducing greenhouse gasses emission by 6% of the total emission reduction target.<br/>Since recently the GOI has also established a new allocation fund for rural electrification called Dana alokasi khusus DAK. The DAK was approved by the ministry of finance. The technical guidelines have been worked out by the DGEEU and have still to be approved by the MEMR. The current budget of DAK is 15 Mio US$. It will increase to 100 Mio US$ per year. DAK is providing 200,000 to 800,000 € to local governments. These governments can use the money to construct new MHPPs, rehabilitate MHPPs, extend the grid of MHPPs or install solar systems. The districts have to contribute at least 10% of the costs. Funds can only be used for hardware. The local governments have to design and construct the plant. Consultant activities are not included, but can partly be financed by the MEMR. |
| | | |
− | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#Overview|Go To Top]] | + | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] |
− | | + | |
| | | |
| = Institutional Set-up in the Energy Sector = | | = Institutional Set-up in the Energy Sector = |
Line 173: |
Line 109: |
| Unfortunately, there is no effective coordination among the different governmental institutions. In fact, the different ministries partly compete with each other and the programs they implement have varying procedures and diverse financing sources. The national electricity system is managed by PLN. This state owned utility company holds a monopoly for the power generation, transmission, and distribution, as well as power retail-ing. PLN currently operates 5,233 power plants, which comprise around 44% of the genera-tion capacity outside the Java-Bali network, It means that the average plant size is less than 5 MW. PLN is managing at least 600 mini-grids. PLN is currently unable to expand its power-generating capacity due to financial difficulties. NGOs play an important role in Indonesia’s energy sector. They are advisers, project devel-opers, and managers of energy programs. NGOs are active in different RE fields. | | Unfortunately, there is no effective coordination among the different governmental institutions. In fact, the different ministries partly compete with each other and the programs they implement have varying procedures and diverse financing sources. The national electricity system is managed by PLN. This state owned utility company holds a monopoly for the power generation, transmission, and distribution, as well as power retail-ing. PLN currently operates 5,233 power plants, which comprise around 44% of the genera-tion capacity outside the Java-Bali network, It means that the average plant size is less than 5 MW. PLN is managing at least 600 mini-grids. PLN is currently unable to expand its power-generating capacity due to financial difficulties. NGOs play an important role in Indonesia’s energy sector. They are advisers, project devel-opers, and managers of energy programs. NGOs are active in different RE fields. |
| | | |
− | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#Overview|Go To Top]] | + | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] |
| | | |
| = Donor Engagement<br/> = | | = Donor Engagement<br/> = |
Line 189: |
Line 125: |
| #BMZ is funding the ASEAN Renewable Energy Support Programme (ASEAN– RESP), a regional project aiming to accelerate the exchange and best practises in the ASEAN region. This project can be used to disseminate results from the ENDEV measure to other ASEAN countries with low electrification ratios like Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar and vice versa. The Hydro Power Competence Center which was established under this project in Bandung is equipped with a hydro power laboratory and can be essential in providing high quality training and testing of equipment for ENDEV projects worldwide. BMU is funding the project Least Cost Renewables (LCORE), which has been commissioned in March 2012. This project is aiming to promote renewables in those fields where they are already cost competitive like replacement of diesel generated power. There is good potential for cooperation with ENDEV especially regarding upscaling of pilot projects. | | #BMZ is funding the ASEAN Renewable Energy Support Programme (ASEAN– RESP), a regional project aiming to accelerate the exchange and best practises in the ASEAN region. This project can be used to disseminate results from the ENDEV measure to other ASEAN countries with low electrification ratios like Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar and vice versa. The Hydro Power Competence Center which was established under this project in Bandung is equipped with a hydro power laboratory and can be essential in providing high quality training and testing of equipment for ENDEV projects worldwide. BMU is funding the project Least Cost Renewables (LCORE), which has been commissioned in March 2012. This project is aiming to promote renewables in those fields where they are already cost competitive like replacement of diesel generated power. There is good potential for cooperation with ENDEV especially regarding upscaling of pilot projects. |
| | | |
− | <br/>
| + | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] |
− | | + | |
− | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#Overview|Go To Top]] | + | |
| | | |
| = References<br/> = | | = References<br/> = |
Line 200: |
Line 134: |
| <references /> | | <references /> |
| | | |
| + | [[Indonesia Energy Situation#toc|►Go to Top]] |
| + | [[Category:CES Country]] |
| + | |
| + | [[Category:Indonesia]] |
| [[Category:Country_Energy_Situation]] | | [[Category:Country_Energy_Situation]] |
− | [[Category:Indonesia]]
| |
The primary energy supply in Indonesia is mainly based on fossil fuels like oil, gas and carbon. In 2009, 43% of Indonesian energy consumption was based on oil, 19% on natural gas and, 34% on coal. Renewable energy, particularly hydro and geothermal have a share of 4%, but statistics do not cover the traditional use of biomass as energy for cooking, lighting and process heat in rural areas, which is estimated to comprise 21% up to 29% of the total energy demand. The focus on fossil fuels was caused by the low price of oil in the past due to own oil sources and prolonged price subsidies. In the meantime, the oil reserve decreased significantly. Considering the existing average production rate, it is estimated that the reserve oil will be exhausted in around 20 years. Indonesia, which had been a founding member of OPEC, but left the organisation in 2009, is now importing larg quantities of oil. On the other hand, Indonesia is still a net exporter of natural gas. That’s why the national utility PLN is switching now power generation from expensive oil to gas and coal of which Indonesia has large reserves.
The total power generation in Indonesia is around 50 GW. Around 30 GW has been installed by the utility PLN. The remaining consists largely of captive power for the manufacturing industry. Diesel generators account for approximately 60 % of captive power capacity, while cogeneration plants provide approximately 25%. 80% from the 30GW are coming from oil, gas, and coal, 18% from hydropower, and 2% from geothermal. However, hydro and geothermal power plants generate a higher share of the electricity as the capacity of the other plants is not fully used. Electricity makes around 10% of of the total energy consumption. About 80% of the electricity is consumed on Java und Bali alone. In recent years consumption of electricity has increased by 7 per cent annually. It is calculated that for every 1 percent increase in GDP the energy demand increases by 1.8 percent. Indonesia failed to meet this demand growth with adequate system investments which has resulted in increased frequency and duration of power outages which prove costly to local industries. These factors have sharply put the need for diversification of supplies into focus and Indonesia has an ambitious plan for renewable energy and in parallel are advancing plans for the use of nuclear energy.
Indonesia has a comparatively low overall rate of electrification for a middle-income country. Figures and interpretations diverge, but as much as 30- 35% of the population representing 75 million people does not have access to electricity. Around 50% of un-electrified people in Indonesia are actually living in (already) electrified areas and would need grid densification programmes. The costs are estimated to be US$ 290 per connection. The other half is living in non-electrified villages, which are mostly found in remote rural areas. Such areas can either be targeted through grid extension or dedicated off-grid solutions. The World Bank Regional Electrification Master Plan for Indonesia made some estimation about least cost options coming to the following conclusions:
Villagers in non-electrified areas rely on candles, kerosene lamps, dry cells and car batteries to satisfy part of their energy needs. Rural households typically spend a significant share of their income on these energy sources – despite the inconvenience and the environmental and health hazards associated with them.
Whilst the application of MHP technology is not new to Indonesia, only a small proportion of the country’s huge mini and micro-hydro power (MHP) potential has been exploited so far. Unfavourable framework conditions for stand-alone systems and on-grid schemes, lack of specialist know-how and a basic lack of awareness of the available potential have been the main reasons for this sluggish progress in the past. However, in remote rural areas, hydro power is now becoming increasingly competitive compared to fossil fuel-powered alternatives, due to the high energy prices (which can be trice as high as in the centres) that neutralise the still existing fuel subsidies by the Indonesian Government.
Other renewable energy technologies like Solar Home Systems, small wind turbines or biogas plants and other bioenergies are spread to a different extend in rural areas, but lack for the technical maturity or sustainable operation and service models that are necessary for large scale dissemination.
The Coordinating Ministry of People’s Welfare is responsible for the development and administration over poverty reduction policies and programs in Indonesia. In the last years government programs have been consolidated in 3 major clusters focussing on
(1) individual assistance and social protection (subsidised staple food and scholarships for the poorest),
(3) strengthening of small and medium enterprises (mainly by providing cheap credits).
As a core element of the national poverty reduction strategy PNPM has been up-scaled in 2009 covering the whole country with a budget over 2 billion US$. The PNPM follows the philosophy of community driven development (CDD), providing institutional training and support to communities, who then can apply for funding for self-defined community development projects. The core PNPM cycle is foreseen to be implemented for three consecutive years building the institutional base in the villages for later intervention of other sector programs. As communities are free to define their priorities they can also opt for local energy infrastructure projects like hydro powered mini grids.
Energy policy for rural electrification is developed by the Directorate General for Electricity and Energy Utilisation (DGEEU) of the Ministry for Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR). A rural electrification program is jointly implemented by the DGEEU and the Indonesian electricity utility PLN.
Part of that strategy is the “community-based rural energy development” concept, according to which cooperatives, municipal institutions, non-governmental organisations and/or private actors, with the technical assistance of PLN, serve as power providers in rural areas. PLN provides assistance at two different levels: either for establishing a stand-alone (isolated) grid including power generation, or for establishing a village network for connection to the PLN-operated central power grid. However, the program has been criticised as inefficient and too bureaucratic.
Rural electrification is generally not financially attractive to PLN because Indonesia’s off-grid areas are sparsely populated, have very low load factor, and are dominated by low-end household consumers who are charged a heavily subsidized tariff (average revenue for household consumers was about IDR 628 kWh in 2006. Most off-grid regions are supplied by diesel power plants that consume high priced diesel oil. This increases PLN’s cost of production far above IDR 2000 kWh.
Unfortunately, there is no effective coordination among the different governmental institutions. In fact, the different ministries partly compete with each other and the programs they implement have varying procedures and diverse financing sources. The national electricity system is managed by PLN. This state owned utility company holds a monopoly for the power generation, transmission, and distribution, as well as power retail-ing. PLN currently operates 5,233 power plants, which comprise around 44% of the genera-tion capacity outside the Java-Bali network, It means that the average plant size is less than 5 MW. PLN is managing at least 600 mini-grids. PLN is currently unable to expand its power-generating capacity due to financial difficulties. NGOs play an important role in Indonesia’s energy sector. They are advisers, project devel-opers, and managers of energy programs. NGOs are active in different RE fields.